Traditional and Cooperative Learning Approaches in Teaching Filipino 9-Asian Literature
Keywords:
Cooperative Learning, Traditional Method, Methodological Triangulation, pretest, posttest, lecture, Ask Together Learn Together, control group, experimental groupAbstract
This research revolves on the use of traditional and Cooperative Learning methods in teaching Filipino 9 - Asian Literature at Zamboanguita Science High School. It aims to determine the effectiveness of these mentioned methods on students' learning in the Filipino subject. The research underwent Methodological Triangulation with pre-test and post-test, actual classroom observation, and Focus Group Discussion. The respondents were twenty-nine (29) students in the experimental group and twenty-eight (28) students in the control group. The study found no significant difference between the pretest results of the lessons of the respondents in both groups. However, there was a significant difference between the post-test results of the respondents' lessons. It was found that before the introduction of the Cooperative Learning method to the experimental group, the level of knowledge of the respondents from both groups was not far apart. It was also shown that the use of the Cooperative Learning method cannot be applied to all lessons. There are only specific lessons where this method is effective.
References
Açıkgöz, Ü.K. (1992). Techniques on teaching literature. Malatya: Uğurel Matbaası. Retrieved December 2016
Açıkgöz, Ü.K. (1999). Ask together-learn together technique. Malatya (Yayınlanmamış Araştırma Raporu). Retrieved
December 2016
Altamira, B.P. (2013). Impact of Cooperative learning on Grade 7 Mathematics. Retrieved October 2016 from https://www.academia.edu/4621530/IMPACT_OF_COOPERATIVE_LEARNING_ON_GRADE_7_MATHEMATICS_CLASS
. Ask Together-Learn Together. Kinuha mula sa https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/.
Aziz, Z. (2010). A comparison of cooperative learning and conventional teaching on students’ achievement in
secondary Mathematics. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Retrieved November 2016 from http://ac.elscdn.com/S1877042810022202/1-s2.0-S1877042810022202-main.pdf?_tid=1dc8bbe2-c820-11e6 814d00000aacb35f&acdnat=1482395274_305709ba0ce5b16e4b5ee4013ad372bc.
Campbell, D.T., & Stanley, J.C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental design for research. Chicago: Rand Mcnally College Publishing Company.
Carter, R. & Long, M. (1991). Teaching Literature: Longman handbook for language teachers. Harlow, Essex Longman; New York: Distributed in U.S.A. by Longman Publishing.
Cimafranca, E. (1995). Approaches in teaching the short story and poetry as practiced by teachers in Negros Oriental
higher education institutions and experimented to the education students at Central Visayas Polytechnic College: A basis for a remodified model of teaching. Di- nalathalang tesis. Silliman University, Dumaguete City.
Chemwei, Bernard, et al., (2013). Effects of a Learning Together Model on Students’ Attitude towards School Poetry. Egerton University, Njoro, Kenya; Baraton, Kenya; Kabarak, Kenya
Colorado, C. (2007). Cooperative learning strategies. Retrieved from http://www.colorincolorado.org/educators/content/cooperative/. October 2016
Dahley, A.M. (n.d.). Cooperative learning classroom research. Retrieved September 2016 from http://alumni.media.mit.edu~andyd/mindset/design/clc_rsch.html.
Eggen, E. & Kauchak, D. (1996). Strategies for teacher. Needham Heights Massachussets: Allyn and Bacon.
Fosnot, C.T. (1996). Constructivist theory, perspective and practices. New York and London: Teachers College Press.
Gacayan, A.A. (2011). Epekto ng mga piling istratehiya sa pagtuturo ng Filipino kaugnay sa akademik performans ng mga estudyante sa Catherina Cittadini School. Di- nalathalang tesis. Dumaguete City.
Gokkurt, B., Dundar, S., Soylu. Y., Akgun, L. (2012). The effects of learning together technique which is based on
cooperative learning on students’ achievement in Mathematics class. Retrieved March 2017 from www.sciencedirect.com.
Gomleksiz, M.N. The effectiveness of cooperative learning method in teaching English as a foreign language in engineering students. European Journal of Engineering Education. 32 (5). 613-625.
Herberyan (2007). Team based learning in an industrial organization Psychology Course. North American Journal of Psychology, 9(1), 143-152.
Hill, K.A. (2000). Cooperative learning as a mean of improving social skill among middle grade students. from http://www.Usoe.K12.ut.US/oals2000/Kathy-hill-cooperative learning.htm.
Hillocks, G. Jr. (1984). What works in teaching composition: a meta-analysis of experimental treatment studies. American Journal of Education.
The University of Chicago Press. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1085093.
Hossain, A. and Tarmizi, R. H. (2013). Effects of cooperative learning on students’ achievement and attitudes in secondary Mathematics. Retrieved March 2017 from www.sciencedirect.com.
Hwang, D and Embi, A. (2007). Approaches employed by secondary school teachers to teaching the literature
component in English. Jurnal Pendidik dan Pendidikan, 22, 1-21. Retrieved December 2016 from http://www.myais.fsktm.um.edu.my/.../Approaches_Employed_By_Secondary_School_ To_Teaching_The_Literature Component_In_English.pdf (Feb 5, 2010).
Teachers
Iqbal, M. (2004). Effective of cooperative learning on academic achievement of secondary school students in Mathematics.Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University Institute of Education and research, Arid Agriculture University, Rwalpindi.
Johnson, D. W.; Johnson, R. T.; Smith, K. A. (1998). Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom, (2nd ed.); Interaction Book: Edina, MN.
Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Co.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R.T. (1991). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Johnson, D., Johnson, R. & Holubec, E. (1998). Cooperation in the classroom. Boston Press.
Johnson, D., Johnson, R. &Holubec, E. (1998). Social interdependence theory. New York Press.
Johnson, D., Johnson, R., & Holubec, E. (1993). Circles of learning: Cooperation in the classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction.
Johnson, D. and R. Johnson. (1983). Learning together and alone. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. First edition, 1975.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Stanne, M. B. (2000). Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
Kagan, S. (1992). We can talk: Cooperative learning in the elementary ESL classroom. Reproduction Service No. (ERIC Document
ED 382 035). Retrieved February 2016 from
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED382035.pdf.
Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. Retrieved from www.KaganOnline.com.
Kassop, M. (2003). Ten ways online education matches or surpasses, face-to-face learning. Book of Educational.
Kaur, G. (2011). Study and analysis of lecture model of teaching. Volume 1, Number 1 (2011), pp. 9-13. Research India Publications. Retrieved from http://www.ripublication.com/ijepa.htm
Khan, S.A. & Ahmad, R.N. (2014). Evaluation of the effectiveness of Cooperative Learning method versus Traditional
Learning method on the reading comprehension of the students. International Islamic University, Islamabad. Retrieved February 2016 from http://www.ue.edu.pk/jrre.
Khan, S. A. (2008) Experimental study to evaluate the effectiveness of cooperative learning versus traditional learning method. International Islamic University, Islamabad. Retrieved February 2016 from
http://ue.edu.pk/jrre/articles/81006.pdf.
Kinilitan, R. (2013). Performans ng mga estudyante sa Filipino I: Isang paghahambing na pag-aaral gamit ang talakayan at kooperatibong pamamaraan. Di- nalathalang tesis. Silliman University, Dumaguete City.
Lazar, G. (1993). Literature and language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Liao, H. C. (2009). Cooperative learning and EFL education: The past, the present, and the future. Journal of National Taichung University: Humanities & Arts, 23(2), 87-108. Lecture. teaching methods/amp. from https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.biyanicolleges.org/lecture-method
Li, H. (2017). Networking for English Literature Class: Cooperative Learning in Chinese Context. Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, China.
McIntosh, N. (1996). Why Do We Lecture? Baltimore, USA: JHPIEGO Corp.
Methodological Triangulation. from http://www.write.com/writing-guides/researchwriting/researchprocess/data-triangulation-how-the-triangulation-of-data-strengthens-your-research/.
Middendorf, J. & Kalish, A. (1996). The ‘Change-up’ in Lectures. TRC Newsletter, 8(1), 5-6.
Morgan, Bobbette M. (2012). Teaching cooperative learning with children’s literature. Retrieved December 2016
Perse, S. (2017). Teaching methods: traditional vs. modern. Kinuha mula sa https://www.stephenperse.com Piaget,
J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence.AMC,10, 12.
Pre-test/Post-test Design. Retrieved from https://statisticshowto.datasciencecentral.com/experimental-design/
Quasi-experimental. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasi-experiment.
Sigau, A. A. (2007). The use of cooperative learning techniques in literature classroom. Retrieved December 2016
from https://ir.unimas.my/4238/1/The%20use%20of%20cooperative%20learning%20techniques%20in%20literature%2 0c lassroom.pdf.
Sii, L. & Chen, S.E. (2016). Types of English literature teaching approaches preferred by teachers in secondary schools in Sarawak. Retrieved December from http://ijleal.ump.edu.my/images/volume4/IJLEAL004.SII__CHEN.pdf.
Slavin, R. (1989). Research on cooperative learning: An international perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 33(4), 231–243.
Slavin, R. (1995). Cooperative learning and student achievement. Longman Publishing.
Slavin, R. (1995). Cooperative learning: theory, research, and practice. (2nd edition), Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Slavin, R.E, Karwett N.L (1985). American educational research journal, 21, 725-736.
Tuballa, C. (2008). Ang paggamit ng pamamaraang tradisyonal at pamamaraang cooperative learning sa pagtuturo ng Filipino sa Negros Oriental State University, lungsod ng Dumaguete, Pilipinas. Di- nalathalang tesis. Negros Oriental State University, Dumaguete City.
Valdez, A.V., Lomoljo, A., Dumrang, S.P., & Didatar, M.M, (2013). Developing critical thinking through activity – based and cooperative learning approach in teaching high school chemistry. International Journal of Social Science and
Humanity, 5, 139-141. Retrieved December 2016 from http://www.ijssh.org/papers/440-H10012.pdf.
Velasco S.T (2009). Comparative study on the effects of cooperative learning models Jigsaw II and student teamsachievement division to student performance in Advanced Algebra. Di- nalathalang tesis. Dumaguete City.
Villafuerte, P. V. & Bernales, R. A. (2008). Pagtuturo ng/sa Filipino: Mga teorya at praktika. Valenzuela City: Mutya Publishing House.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wang, P. T. (2009). Applying Slavin’s cooperative learning techniques to a college EFL conversation class. Department of Applied
English, Hsing Wu College. Retrieved February 2016 from
http://www.hraljournal.com/Page/13%20Tzu-Pu%20Wang.pdf.
Yaqoob, M. (2011). Reader and text: literary theory and teaching of literature in the twenty first century. Retrieved December 2016 from http://www.ipedr.com/vol26/102-ICLLL%202011-L10180.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ana Melissa V. Tubio (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
