Video-Based Teaching and Learning in Mathematics
Keywords:
computer systems servicingAbstract
This study investigates the effectiveness of Video-Based Teaching and Learning (VBTL) strategy in enhancing mathematics performance across diverse subjects. Employing a concurrent embedded mixed-method pretest-posttest approach with a control group and quasi-experimental design, initial assessments revealed comparable pretest math performance levels between control and experimental groups. However, subsequent analysis unveiled substantial differences in posttest math performance. Notably, in Linear Inequalities and System, the experimental group achieved an impressive posttest score of 90%, compared to the control's 53.5%, albeit lacking statistical significance (t-value = -1.479, p-value = 0.374). Conversely, in Function and Relation, the experimental group demonstrated a significant score of 78.938%, compared to the control's 48.23%, confirmed by statistical analysis (t-value = -9.197, p-value < 0.001). Similarly, in Logic and Proof, the experimental group scored notably higher (71.917%) than the control (47.833%), with statistical confirmation (t-value = -3.495, p-value < 0.001). The study confirms that Video-Based Teaching and Learning (VBTL) effectively improves mathematics performance by reducing cognitive load and enhancing comprehension of mathematical concepts through visual aids and interactive elements, thus validating the efficacy of VBTL and contributing to discussions on innovative teaching strategies in mathematics education. These findings contribute to discussions on innovative teaching strategies in mathematics education, emphasizing VBTL's role in reducing cognitive load and enhancing comprehension of mathematical concepts.
References
Almeida, F. (2018). Strategies to Perform a Mixed Methods Study. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).
Ayres, P. (2012). Worked Example Effect. In: Seel, N.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_20
Berger, E. J., & Wilson, M. (2016, June), A Laboratory Study of Student Usage of Worked-example Videos to Support Problem Solving Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.26342
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
Chen, O., Castro-Alonso, J. C., Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2018). Extending cognitive load theory to incorporate working memory resource depletion: Evidence from the spacing effect. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 483–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9426.
Chen, O., Kalyuga, S. & Sweller, J. The Expertise Reversal Effect is a Variant of the More General Element Interactivity Effect. Educ Psychol Rev 29, 393–405 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9359-1
Chen, O., Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2016). Relations between the worked example and generation effects on immediate and delayed tests. Learning and Instruction, 45, 2030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.06.007
Chen, O., Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2016a). When instructional guidance is needed. Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 33, 149–162.
Dodson, S., Roll, I., Fong, M., Yoon, D., Harandi, N. M., & Fels, S. (2018). An active viewing framework for video-based learning. https://doi.org/10.1145/3231644.3231682
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2018). What works and doesn’t work with instructional video. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 465–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.015
Gambari, A. I., Shittu, A. T., Daramola, F. O., & James, M. (2016). Effects of Video-Based Cooperative, Competitive and Individualized Instructional Strategies on the Performance of Senior Secondary Schools Students in Geometry. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(4), 31–4 http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1116321.pdf
Gambari, A. I., Yaki, A. A., Gana, E. S., & Ughovwa, Q. E. (2014). Improving Secondary School Students’ Achievement and Retention in Biology Through Video-Based Multimedia Instruction. InSight : A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 9, 78–91. https://doi.org/10.46504/09201407ga
Göğüş, A. (2012). Constructivist Learning. In Springer eBooks (pp. 783–786). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_142
Gouia, R., & Gunn, C. (2016). Making mathematics meaningful for freshmen students: investigating students’ preferences of pre-class videos. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-015-0026-9.
Gambari, I.A., James, M., & Olumorin, C.O. (2013). Effectiveness of Video Based Cooperative Learning Strategy on High, Medium and Low Academic Achievers.
Giannakos, M. N. (2013). Exploring the video‐based learning research: A review of the literature. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12070
Giannakos, M. N., Krogstie, J., & Aalberg, T. (2016). Video-based learning ecosystem to support active learning: application to an introductory computer science course. Smart Learning Environments, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-016-0036-0
Gouia, R., Gunn, C. Making mathematics meaningful for freshmen students: investigating students’ preferences of pre-class videos. RPTEL 11, 2 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-015-0026-9
Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How video production affects student engagement. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556325.2566239
Galatsopoulou, F., Kenterelidou, C., Kotsakis, R., & Matsiola, M. (2022). Examining Students’ Perceptions towards Video-Based and Video-Assisted Active Learning Scenarios in Journalism and Communication Courses. Education Sciences, 12(2), 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020074
H, A. L. F., & Titikusumawati, E. (2024, January 16). MATERIALS DEVELOPMENT TEACHING MATHEMATICS PHET VIDEO BASED ON THE CONCEPT OF FRACTIONAL NUMBERS FOR CLASS IV STUDENTS. https://incoils.or.id/index.php/INCOILS/article/view/129
Haw, J. Y., King, R. B., & Trinidad, J. E. R. (2021). Need supportive teaching is associated with greater reading achievement: What the Philippines can learn from PISA 2018. International Journal of Educational Research, 110, 101864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101864
Hollands, F. M., & Tirthali, D. (2014). MOOCs: Expectations and reality. Full report. Center for Benefit-Cost Studies of Education, Teachers College, Columbia University, NY.Retrieved December 20, 2018, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED547237.pdf
Hansch, A., Hillers, L., McConachie, K., Newman, C., Schildhauer, T., & Schmidt, P. (2015). Video and online learning: Critical reflections and findings from the field. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2577882
Jacobs, J. M., Hollingsworth, H., & Givvin, K. B. (2007). Video-Based Research Made “Easy”: Methodological Lessons Learned from the TIMSS Video Studies. Field Methods, 19(3), 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x07302106
Jamie Costley Christopher Henry Lange , (2017)," Video lectures in e-learning: effects of viewership and media diversity on learning, satisfaction, engagement, interest, and future behavioral intention ", Interactive Technology and Smart Education, Vol. 14 Iss 1 pp.
Johnson, H. M., Dunlap, J. C., Verma, G., McClintock, E., DeBay, D. J., & Bourdeaux, B. (2019). Video-Based Teaching Playgrounds: Designing Online Learning Opportunities to Foster Professional Noticing of Teaching Practices. TechTrends, 63(2), 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0286-5
Kizilcec R.F., Pérez-Sanagustín M. & Maldonado J.J., Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in Massive Open Online Courses, Computers & Education (2016). http://doi.org:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001
Kanellopoulou, C., Kermanidis, K. L., & Giannakoulopoulos, A. (2019). The Dual-Coding and Multimedia Learning Theories: Film Subtitles as a Vocabulary Teaching Tool. Education Sciences, 9(3), 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030210
Kay, R. (2012). Exploring the use of video podcasts in education: A comprehensive review of the literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 820–831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.01.011
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2018). What works and doesn’t work with instructional video. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 465–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.015
Lalian, O. N. (2018). The effects of using video media in mathematics learning on students’ cognitive and affective aspects. In AIP Conference Proceedings. American Institute of Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5061864
Mayer, R. E., & Fiorella, L. (2014). Principles for Reducing Extraneous Processing in Multimedia Learning: Coherence, Signaling, Redundancy, Spatial Contiguity, and Temporal Contiguity Principles. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, 279–315. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139547369.015
Mayer, R. E. (2014). Principles based on social cues in multimedia learning: Personalization, voice, image, and embodiment principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 345–368). New York, NY: Cambridge University
Mayer, R. E. (2014). The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. In Cambridge University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139547369
Mayer, R. E. (2017). Using multimedia for e‐learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(5), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12197
Mayer, R. E., Fiorella, L., & Stull, A. (2020). Five ways to increase the effectiveness of instructional video. Educational Technology Research and Development. doi:10.1007/s11423-020-09749-6
Mayer, R. E. (2021). Evidence-Based Principles for How to Design Effective Instructional Videos. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 10(2), 229–240. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.03.007
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Kelly, D. L., & Fishbein, B. (2020). TIMSS 2019 International Results in Mathematics and Science. Retrieved from Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center website: https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/international-results/
One-Way ANCOVA for 2 independent samples. (2023.). http://vassarstats.net/ancova2L.html
Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2012). An evolutionary upgrade of cognitive load theory: using the human motor system and collaboration to support the learning of complex cognitive tasks.Educational Psychology Review, 24, 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9179-2.
PISA 2022 Results Factsheets Philippines PUBE. (2022.). https://www.oecd.org/publication/pisa-2022-results/webbooks/dynamic/pisa-country-notes/a0882a2d/pdf/philippines.pdf
Renkl, A. (1997). Learning from worked-out examples: A study on individual differences. Cognitive Science, 21(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0364-0213(99)80017-2s
Sweller, J., & Sweller, S. (2006). Natural information processing systems. Evolutionary Psychology, 4, 434–458.
Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In J. P. Mestre & B. H. Ross (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Cognition in education (pp. 37–76). Elsevier Academic.
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive Load Theory. In Springer eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4
Sweller, J. (2015). In academe, what is learned and how is it learned? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 190–194.
Sweller, J. (2016). Cognitive load theory, evolutionary educational psychology, and instructional design. In D.Geary & D. Berch (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on child development and education (pp. 291–306). Switzerland: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29986-0
Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In J. P. Mestre & B. H. Ross (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Cognition in education (pp. 37–76). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory . New York, NY: Springer
Sweller, J., & Paas, F. (2017). Should self-regulated learning be integrated with cognitive load theory? A commentary. Learning and Instruction, 51, 85–89.
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 261–292.
Sweller, J. (2020). Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3
Sweller, J.,Working memory, long-term memory, and instructional design, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.12.002
Smith, P. (2021b). 5 benefits of video-based learning. CrowdWisdom by Community Brands. https://www.crowdwisdomlms.com/blog/5-benefits-of-video-based learning/
Smith, N. (2018). Integrating gamification into mathematics instruction: A qualitative exploratory case study on the perceptions of teachers at the fourth and fifth grade level. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). William Howard Taft University, School of Education.
Statement on the Philippines’ ranking in the 2018 PISA results | Department of Education. (2019b, December 4). https://www.deped.gov.ph/2019/12/04/statement-on-the philippines-ranking-in-the-2018-pisa-results/
TIMSS 2019 Mathematics Framework – TIMSS 2019 ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORKS. (2019.). https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/frameworks/framework-chapters/mathematics-framework/
The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. (2021). In Cambridge University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894333
https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/encyclopedia/philippines.html
Weinberg, A., & Thomas, M. (2018). Student learning and sense-making from video lectures. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(6), 922-943.
van Es, E. A., Cashen, M., Barnhart, T., & Auger, A. (2017). Learning to notice mathematics instruction: Using video to develop preservice teachers’ vision of ambitious pedagogy. Cognition and Instruction, 35(3), 165–187.
Van Wermeskerken, M., Ravensbergen, S., & Van Gog, T. (2017). Effects of instructor presence in video modeling examples on attention and learning. Computers in Human Behavior,89, 430–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.038
Yousef, A. E., Chatti, M. A., & Schroeder, U. (2014). The State of Video-Based Learning: A Review and Future Perspectives. Advances in Life Sciences, 6, 122 135.https://www.thinkmind.org/articles/lifsci_v6_n34_2014_4.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Amelton I. Ofril, MAEd, LPT, Mary Gold N. Ofril, MAEd, LPT, Vincent Theodore M. Balo, MSc, Dev.Ed. (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
