Teacher Preparedness and Resource Availability: Key Factors for Implementing the MATATAG Science Curriculum
Keywords:
MATATAG Curriculum, Science Education, Curriculum Reform, 21st Century CompetenciesAbstract
Curriculum reform in the Philippines is an ongoing process that seeks to address the evolving needs of society and the global landscape. The newly introduced MATATAG curriculum is designed specifically to tackle the challenges facing science education and to align with the demands for 21st-century competencies, including skills relevant to Industry 4.0 and 5.0. This study explores the rationale behind the curriculum reform in science education under the MATATAG framework, examining its innovative features and their implications for the educational landscape. By employing qualitative research methods, the study conducts a comprehensive review of pertinent literature, government documents, and educational reports to assess the curriculum's responsiveness to contemporary challenges in science education. Through this analysis, the research highlights how the MATATAG curriculum not only seeks to improve the quality of science education in the Philippines but also aims to equip learners with the necessary competencies to thrive in a rapidly changing global workforce. The findings of this study contribute valuable insights for educators, policymakers, and stakeholders involved in the ongoing development and implementation of educational reforms in the Philippines, emphasizing the need for an adaptive curriculum that meets both local and global educational standards.
References
Acosta, I. C., & Acosta, A. S. (2017). A Mixed Methods Study on Teachers' Perceptions of Readiness of Higher Education Institutions to the Implementation of the K-12 Curriculum. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(7), 1215-1232.
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369-386.
Baker, B. D., Sciarra, D. G., & Farrie, D. (2014). Is school funding fair? A national report card. Education Law Center.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Busetto, L., Wick, W., & Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and Practice, 2(14), 1-10.
Cabansag, M. G. S. (2014). Impact statements on the K-12 science program in the enhanced basic education curriculum in provincial schools. Researchers World, 5(2), 29.
Campbel, L. (2020). Curriculum theory: Balancing the needs of society and the individual. Educational Leadership, 68(4), 30-34.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
Department of Education. (2023a). MATATAG curriculum framework: Building lifelong learners for the future.
DepEd. (2013). Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/DO_s2013_43.pdf
DepEd. (2023). MATATAG Curriculum. https://www.deped.gov.ph/matatag-curriculum/
Eilks, I. (2015). Science education and societal transformation: Global challenges and the role of science educators. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(7), 683-696.
Ekamilasari, S., & Pursitasari, R. (2021). Enhancing scientific literacy through curriculum innovation. Journal of Education and Learning, 15(2), 130-140.
Ednave, R., Gatchalian, V., Mamisao, J., Canuto, X. O., Caugiran, M. D., Ekid, J., ... & Balmeo, M. L. (2018). Problems and challenges encountered in the implementation of the K to 12 Curriculum: A synthesis. Retrieved from Academia: https://www.academia.edu/39704530/PROBLEMS_AND_CHALLENGES_ENCOUNTERED_IN_THE_IMPLEMENTATION_OF_THE_K_TO_12_CURRICULUM_A_SYNTHESIS.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
Fullan, M. (2015). The new meaning of educational change. Teachers College Press.
Gove, A. K., & Wetterberg, A. (Eds.). (2011). The early grade reading assessment: Applications and interventions to improve basic literacy. RTI Press.
Guskey, T. R., & Yoon, K. S. (2009). What works in professional development? Phi Delta Kappan, 90(7), 495-500.
Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Kilag, O. K., Andrin, G., Abellanosa, C., Villaver Jr, M., Uy, F., & Sasan, J. M. (2024). MATATAG Curriculum Rollout: Understanding Challenges for Effective Implementation. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE), 1(5), 172-177.
Kilag, O. K., Jesus, J., Uy, F., Sasan, J. M., Seblos, K., & Gier, R. A. (2024). Educational Transformation: Perspectives on the Implementation of the MATATAG Curriculum in the Philippines. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE), 1(5), 306-311.
Le, C., Wolfe, R. E., & Steinberg, A. (2014). The Past and the Promise: Today's Competency Education Movement. Students at the Center: Competency Education Research Series. Jobs For the Future.
Marzano, R. J., & Marzano, J. S. (2003). The key to classroom management. Educational Leadership, 61(1), 6-13.
Miao, Z., Bokhove, C., Reynolds, D., & Charalambous, C. Y. (2022). Rational numbers and proportional reasoning in Chinese primary schools: Patterns, latent classes, and reasoning processes. Asian Journal for Mathematics Education, 1(4), 408-436.
Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Kelly, D. L., & Fishbein, B. (2020). TIMSS 2019 international results in mathematics and science.
OECD, P. (2019). Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do, PISA.
Philippine News Agency. (2023). DepEd: Teachers, learners “receptive” to MATATAG Curriculum. https://www.pna.gov.ph/index.php/articles/1210540
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications.
SEAMEO INNOTECH. (2012). K to 12 Toolkit: Resource Guide for Teacher Educators.
Sturgis, C., & Casey, K. (2018). Designing for Equity: Leveraging Competency-Based Education to Ensure All Students Succeed. CompetencyWorks Final Paper. iNACOL.
Tirol, S. L. (2022). Spiral Progression Approach in the K to 12 Science Curriculum: A Literature Review. International Journal of Education (IJE), 10(4).
UNESCO. (2019). Education for Sustainable Development: A Roadmap. Paris: UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/sustainable-development/education
UNESCO. (2020). Education in a Post-COVID World: Nine Ideas for Public Action. Paris: UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373717
Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80-91.
World Bank. (2018). Philippines: Learning Poverty Brief. World Bank Group. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099000207152223103/pdf/IDU002b5536c0db4104ec3087d809906ec2eae56.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Renith S. Guanzon, Osias Kit T. Kilag, Mervin T. Arcillo, Rodjhun B. Navarro, Ralph Arjay C. Dela Cruz, Jenicca Yloah C. Pareja (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
