Dialectics of Understanding: Critical Realism's Role in Evaluating Chomsky's Scientific Methodology in Linguistics

Authors

  • Osias Kit T. Kilag PAU Excellencia Global Academy Foundation, Inc., Toledo City, Cebu, Philippines Author
  • Ryzel Maureen T. Figer-Canes Eastern Visayas State University, Tacloban City, Philippines Author
  • Lorlaine R. Dacanay Department of Education, Schools Division of Talisay City, Philippines Author
  • Ma. Sophia Jade G. Pintado ECT Excellencia Global Academy Foundation, Inc., Buanoy, Balamban, Cebu, Philippines Author
  • Jolina D. Pontellano ECT Excellencia Global Academy Foundation, Inc., Buanoy, Balamban, Cebu, Philippines Author
  • Yola Marie T. Dela Cerna ECT Excellencia Global Academy Foundation, Inc., Buanoy, Balamban, Cebu, Philippines Author

Keywords:

linguistic nativism, Noam Chomsky, universal grammar, critical realism

Abstract

This study examines in depth the theory of linguistic nativism proposed by Noam Chomsky, exploring its basis and implications in a critical realist perspective. Chomsky's theory postulates innate cognitive systems known as universal language grammar. Through a critical realist lens that cannot account for the systematic acquisition of linguistics input, this study critically examines the ontological and epistemological foundations of Chomsky's theory, as well as its empirical basis and criticism. Proponents of critical realism argued the role of sociocultural factors in language development and the need for empirical evidence to support theoretical claims. Thus, this particular study offers insights into the complexities of language acquisition.

References

Alduais, A., Almaghlouth, S., Alfadda, H., & Qasem, F. (2022). Biolinguistics: A Scientometric Analysis of Research on (Children’s) Molecular Genetics of Speech and Language (Disorders). Children, 9(9), 1300. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9091300

Bavali, M., & Sadighi, F. (2008). Chomsky's Universal Grammar and Halliday's Systemic Functional Linguistics: An Appraisal and a Compromise. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 11-28. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ920998.pdf

Brunson, L., Lauzier‐Jobin, F., Olson, B., & Côté, L. P. (2023). Seven key insights from critical realism and their implications for ecological thinking and action in community psychology. Journal of Community Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.23054

Canes, R. M., Cojuangco, F., & Kilag, O. K. (2023). The Enduring Significance of Chomsky's Language and Responsibility: Current Linguistic Perspectives. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 1(5), 536-546.

Chomsky, N. (2010). The chomsky reader. Pantheon.

Chomsky, N., & Chomsky, N. (1998). Universal grammar. What's Left.

Chomsky, N., Gallego, Á. J., & Ott, D. (2019). Generative grammar and the faculty of language: Insights, questions, and challenges. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 229-261.

Chomsky, N., Hornstein, N., & Lightfoot, D. (1981). Principles and Parameters in Syntactic Theory in Explanation in Linguistics. The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition.

Dąbrowska, E. (2015). What exactly is Universal Grammar, and has anyone seen it?. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 852. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00852

De Souza, D. E. (2022). A critical realist approach to systems thinking in evaluation. Evaluation, 28(1), 72-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890211064639

Goldsmith, J. (2012). Chomskyan (r) evolutions. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23251848.pdf?casa_token=P9WEVjdo5uoAAAAA:lUnTy36zJjQ_sI65P22Qfk73RVwUFYGfCE3EBG1TBm-u0Cp02YN3gCZPYbTxU850u6TULVbqZY0y_M-khmBb_f1b1CJ1vcSMji710EWV0mqUlcC7t4A

Gómez, R. L., & Gerken, L. (2000). Infant artificial language learning and language acquisition. Trends in cognitive sciences, 4(5), 178-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01467-4

Jones, P. E. (2003). Critical realism and scientific method in Chomsky’s linguistics. Critical realism: The difference it makes, 90-107.

Lin, F. Y. (2017). A refutation of universal grammar. Lingua, 193, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2017.04.003

Lipscomb, M. (2009). The theory and application of critical realist philosophy and morphogenetic methodology: Emergent structural and agential relations at a hospice (Doctoral dissertation, Doctoral dissertation, University of the West of England). https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/323899228.pdf

Malbas, M., Dacanay, L., & Kilag, O. K. (2023). The Synergy Between Generative Grammars and Literary Style: A Chomskyan Perspective. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 1(5), 73-84.

Nastar, M. (2023). A Critical Realist Approach to Reflexivity in Sustainability Research. Sustainability, 15(3), 2685. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032685

Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (1994). Ever since language and learning: afterthoughts on the Piaget-Chomsky debate. Cognition, 50(1-3), 315-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90034-5

Shotter, J. (1992). Is Bhaskar's critical realism only a theoretical realism?. History of the Human Sciences, 5(3), 157-173. https://doi.org/10.1177/095269519200500315

Uy, F., Cojuangco, F., Canes, R. M., Kilag, O. K., Abendan, C. F., & Dicdiquin, I. (2023). Syntax and Beyond: Investigating Chomsky's Universal Grammar in the Acquisition of Second Languages. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 1(5), 345-357.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-26

How to Cite

Kilag, O. K., Canes, R. M., Dacanay, L., Pintado, M. S. J., Pontellano, J. ., & Dela Cerna, Y. M. (2024). Dialectics of Understanding: Critical Realism’s Role in Evaluating Chomsky’s Scientific Methodology in Linguistics. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE), 1(9), 291-295. https://risejournals.org/index.php/imjrise/article/view/669