STUDENTS' PREFERENCES BETWEEN PRINTED AND DIGITALTEACHING MATERIALS
Keywords:
Teaching Materials, Quantitative Methodology, Descriptive DesignAbstract
This study aimed to investigate the students’ preferences in teaching materials between printed and digital. This study utilized a quantitative methodology with a descriptive design to interpret collected data. The survey was administered via Printed Survey Form and utilized a simple percentage and weighted mean for data analysis. The finding shows that the majority of the students are prefer to have their teaching materials on print. Such as books, printed output, and other print-related resources. The researchers have agreed to recommend that each student must have the privilege to choose either they want to buy their own book or not. This is to ensure that the school caters the student’s best interests this study highlights the importance of engaging materials, and the advantages of both formats (focus/annotation for print and interactivity for digital).The research aims to explore the student preference and its connection to academic performance. It also identifies limitations to students’ such as lack of printed materials and internet connectivity issues. Ultimately, this study seeks to inform educators in choosing the appropriate materials to optimize the learning experience for students. The study of Edgar Dale’s cone of experience, suggests that people learn best by doing, with reading and other visual aids at the higher, and also the theory implies that interaction with the materials is the key to learning .
References
Araújo, J. Knijnik, A.P. Ovens, How do physical education and health respond to the growing influence in media and digital technologies? An analysis of curriculum in Brazil, Australia and New Zealand, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53 (4) (2021), pp. 563-577. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2020.1734664
A.Borthwick, C.L. Anderson, E.S. Finsness, T.S. Foulger, Special article personal wearable technologies in education: Value or villain?, Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 31 (3) (2015), pp. 85-92
https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2015.1021982
A.Kumar, R. Agrawal, V.A. Wankhede, M. Sharma, E. Mulat-Weldemeskel, A framework for assessing social acceptability of industry 4.0 technologies for the development of digital manufacturing, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174 (2022), Article 121217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121217
Armenton, J. M., Ortiz, R. M., Tejano, S. M., & Tero, R. (2022). Factors That Affect the Learning of Students in an Online Learning Modality. (pp. 1–1) Mandaue City College. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11070973
Arop, B. A., Umanah, F. I., & Effiong, O. E. (2019). Effect of instructional materials on the teaching and learning of basic science in junior secondary schools in Cross River State, Nigeria. Global Journal of Educational Research, 14(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.4314/gjedr.v14i1.9
B.E. Penprase, The fourth industrial revolution and higher education, Higher education in the era of the fourth industrial revolution, 10 (2018), pp. 978-981. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0194-0_9
Cavanagh, S. (2020, December 1). K-12 print needs persist despite digital growth. Education Week.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2016.1172444
Charbonnet, C. (2023, August 29). The role of libraries in teaching and learning.
Biblionix - Home of the LibraryAutomation System. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11125-023-09670-9
Cuevas, J. A. (2015). Is learning styles-based instruction effective? A comprehensive analysis of recent research on learning styles. Theory and Research in Education, 13(3), 308–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878515606621
C.I. Büyükbaykal, Communication technologies and education in the information age, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174 (2015), pp. 636-640.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.594
Desk, E. (2023, May 9). Significance of print media: Empowering reading skills.
EDUCATION TODAY. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2012.698860
Estriégana, R., Medina-Merodio, J., & Barchino, R. (2019). Student acceptance of virtual laboratory and practical work: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Computers & Education,135,1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.010
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022, May 23). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A Review. Sustainable Operations and Computers. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
Hirsh-Pasek K., Zosh J. M., Golinkoff R. M., Gray J. H., Robb M. B., Kaufman J. (2015). Putting education in “educational” apps: Lessons from the science of learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16, 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615569721
Keengwe, M. Bhargava, Mobile learning and integration of mobile technologies in education, Education and Information Technologies, 19 (4) (2014), pp. 737-746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-013-9250-3
Kryukov, V., & Gorin, A. (2017). Digital technologies as education innovation at universities. Australian Educational Computing, 32(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
Mahmud, A. F., Muin, S., & Hamia, N. (2019). Female Perspective on Learning Styles: English Department Students Universitas Muhammadiyah Maluku Utara. Learning Styles Research: Understanding How Teaching Should Be Impacted by the Way Learners Learn Part III: Understanding How Learners’ Personality Styles Impact Learning. https://doi.org/10.2991/isseh-18.2019.41
Mayembe, E., & Nsabata, S. (2020, November 18). Print-Based Learning Media.
ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.48173/jev.v1i1.23.
Moussa, N. (2014). The importance of learning styles in education. Institute for Learning Styles Journal,1(2),19-27.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56741/ijlree.v1i02.72
O. Lopez-Fernandez, Emerging Health and Education Issues related to Internet Technologies and addictive problems, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18 (1) (2021), p. 321. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010321
Ordaniza, L., & Superales, J. (2022). Student’s Perception Towards the Quality of Online Education. (pp. 1–1) Mandaue City College. https://doi.org/10.3390%2Fijerph18010321
Quinain, R. R. P., Abanda, J. B., Rosell, J. B., & Maylin, M. G. (n.d.). Chapter 1: The Problem. In RESPONSIVENESS OF LEARNING MODALITY OF GRADE 6 LEARNERS TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE (pp. 1–1). Mandaue City
College. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.181
R. Gurunath, D. Samanta, A novel approach for semantic web application in online education based on steganography, International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), 17 (4) (2022), pp. 1-13
https://doi.org/10.4018/IJWLTT.285569.
S.Kosaretsky, S. Zair-Bek, Y. Kersha, R. Zvyagintsev, General education in Russia during COVID-19: Readiness, policy response, and lessons learned, Primary and Secondary Education During Covid-19, Springer, Cham (2022), pp. 227-261. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia2010025
Strouse, G. A., Mourlam, D. J., & Newland, L. A. (2019, July 19). Educational and Fun? Parent Versus Preschooler Perceptions and Co-Use of Digital and Print Media. Sage Journals. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419861085
Strouse, G. A., Newland, L. A., & Mourlam, D. (2019). Educational and Fun? Parent versus Preschooler Perceptions and Co-Use of Digital and Print Media. AERA Open, 5(3), 233285841986108. technologies in education, Proceedings of the 4th National Conference, 6 (2010),pp. 109-126. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419861085
Takacs Z. K., Swart E. K., Bus A. G. (2015). Benefits and pitfalls of multimedia and interactive features in technology-enhanced storybooks: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85, 698–739. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.3102/0034654314566989
T.A. Vakaliuk, O.M. Spirin, N.M. Lobanchykova, L.A. Martseva, I.V. Novitska, V.V. Kontsedailo, Features of distance learning of cloud technologies for the quarantine organisation’s educational process, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 1840 (1) (2021, March), Article 012051. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012051
The importance of learning materials in teaching. (2021, November 20). The Classroom
| Empowering Students in Their College Journey. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/cphpj-2013-0014
Trembach, S., & Deng, L. (2018). Understanding millennial learning in academic libraries: Learning styles, emerging technologies, and the efficacy of information literacy instruction. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 25(3), 297–315.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2018.1484835
V.L. Dudar, V.V. Riznyk, V.V. Kotsur, S.S. Pechenizka, O.A. Kovtun, Use of modern technologies and digital tools in the context of distance and mixed learning, Linguistics and Culture Review, 5 (S2) (2021), pp. 733-750. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS2.1416
Wang, L., & Cook, S. A. (2017). Staff development programs on teaching skills and curriculum integration of academic and information literacy at the University of Auckland. In Elsevier eBooks(pp. 107–118). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-100630-6.00007-2
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jelly A. Cuyag, Dimple T. Lawan, Mylen A. Coronel, Gethrou Veidall Sanchez, Ma. Loth M. Lamanilao (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
