The Limits of Innateness: A Critical Realist Examination of Chomsky's Theory of Language Acquisition

Authors

  • Osias Kit T. Kilag PAU Excellencia Global Academy Foundation, Inc., Mercado St., Poblacion, Toledo City, Cebu, Philippines Author
  • Fideliza U. Cojuangco Eastern Visayas State University, Tacloban City, Philippines Author
  • Francisca T. Uy ECT Excellencia Global Academy Foundation, Inc., Buanoy, Balamban, Cebu, Philippines Author
  • Lorlaine R. Dacanay Department of Education, Schools Division of Talisay City, Philippines Author
  • Maria Niña N. Rafaela PAU Excellencia Global Academy Foundation, Inc., Mercado St., Poblacion, Toledo City, Philippines Author
  • Jenicca Yloah C. Pareja PAU Excellencia Global Academy Foundation, Inc., Mercado St., Poblacion, Toledo City, Philippines Author

Keywords:

Critical Realism, Universal Grammar, Linguistic Inquiry, Ontological and Epistemological Assumption

Abstract

This paper examines the intersection of Critical Realism and Noam Chomsky’s theory of Universal Grammar (UG) within the context of linguistic inquiry. Chomsky’s contributions to linguistics, particularly his theory of innate grammar, have sparked extensive debate regarding the scientific rigor of his methodologies. Critical Realism, a philosophical framework that emphasizes the exploration of underlying structures and mechanisms while acknowledging the limitations of human knowledge, provides a unique perspective for evaluating Chomsky’s theories. This study applies Critical Realism to assess Chomsky’s ontological and epistemological assumptions, empirical validity, and explanatory power, offering a nuanced analysis of Chomsky’s approach to language acquisition.

References

Alduais, A., Almaghlouth, S., Alfadda, H., & Qasem, F. (2022). Biolinguistics: A Scientometric Analysis of Research on (Children’s) Molecular Genetics of Speech and Language (Disorders). Children, 9(9), 1300. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9091300

Bavali, M., & Sadighi, F. (2008). Chomsky's Universal Grammar and Halliday's Systemic Functional Linguistics: An Appraisal and a Compromise. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 11-28. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ920998.pdf

Brunson, L., Lauzier‐Jobin, F., Olson, B., & Côté, L. P. (2023). Seven key insights from critical realism and their implications for ecological thinking and action in community psychology. Journal of Community Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.23054

Canes, R. M., Cojuangco, F., & Kilag, O. K. (2023). The Enduring Significance of Chomsky's Language and Responsibility: Current Linguistic Perspectives. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 1(5), 536-546.

Chomsky, N. (2010). The chomsky reader. Pantheon.

Chomsky, N., & Chomsky, N. (1998). Universal grammar. What's Left.

Chomsky, N., Gallego, Á. J., & Ott, D. (2019). Generative grammar and the faculty of language: Insights, questions, and challenges. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 229-261.

Chomsky, N., Hornstein, N., & Lightfoot, D. (1981). Principles and Parameters in Syntactic Theory in Explanation in Linguistics. The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition.

Dąbrowska, E. (2015). What exactly is Universal Grammar, and has anyone seen it?. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 852. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00852

De Souza, D. E. (2022). A critical realist approach to systems thinking in evaluation. Evaluation, 28(1), 72-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890211064639

Goldsmith, J. (2012). Chomskyan (r) evolutions. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23251848.pdf?casa_token=P9WEVjdo5uoAAAAA:lUnTy36zJjQ_sI65P22Qfk73RVwUFYGfCE3EBG1TBm-u0Cp02YN3gCZPYbTxU850u6TULVbqZY0y_M-khmBb_f1b1CJ1vcSMji710EWV0mqUlcC7t4A

Gómez, R. L., & Gerken, L. (2000). Infant artificial language learning and language acquisition. Trends in cognitive sciences, 4(5), 178-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01467-4

Jones, P. E. (2003). Critical realism and scientific method in Chomsky’s linguistics. Critical realism: The difference it makes, 90-107.

Lin, F. Y. (2017). A refutation of universal grammar. Lingua, 193, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2017.04.003

Lipscomb, M. (2009). The theory and application of critical realist philosophy and morphogenetic methodology: Emergent structural and agential relations at a hospice (Doctoral dissertation, Doctoral dissertation, University of the West of England). https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/323899228.pdf

Malbas, M., Dacanay, L., & Kilag, O. K. (2023). The Synergy Between Generative Grammars and Literary Style: A Chomskyan Perspective. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 1(5), 73-84.

Nastar, M. (2023). A Critical Realist Approach to Reflexivity in Sustainability Research. Sustainability, 15(3), 2685. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032685

Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (1994). Ever since language and learning: afterthoughts on the Piaget-Chomsky debate. Cognition, 50(1-3), 315-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90034-5

Shotter, J. (1992). Is Bhaskar's critical realism only a theoretical realism?. History of the Human Sciences, 5(3), 157-173. https://doi.org/10.1177/095269519200500315

Uy, F., Cojuangco, F., Canes, R. M., Kilag, O. K., Abendan, C. F., & Dicdiquin, I. (2023). Syntax and Beyond: Investigating Chomsky's Universal Grammar in the Acquisition of Second Languages. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 1(5), 345-357.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-05

How to Cite

Kilag, O. K. ., Cojuangco, F., Uy , F. ., Dacanay, L., Rafaela , M. N. ., & Pareja, J. Y. (2024). The Limits of Innateness: A Critical Realist Examination of Chomsky’s Theory of Language Acquisition. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE), 1(9), 74-79. https://risejournals.org/index.php/imjrise/article/view/656

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

Similar Articles

1-10 of 132

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.