A Comparative Study of K-12 and MATATAG Curricula
Keywords:
K-12 curriculum, MATATAG curriculum, Philippines, education reformAbstract
The comprehensive study comparing the K-12 and MATATAG curricula in the Philippines reveals promising outcomes and challenges. Under the MATATAG curriculum, students exhibit improved performance in standardized assessments, attributed to its emphasis on foundational skills and competency-based learning. Teachers report increased preparedness and support, benefiting from comprehensive professional development programs and clear curriculum guidelines. Moreover, students demonstrate higher engagement and motivation, facilitated by student-centered teaching methods. However, challenges such as disparities in resource allocation and the transition process for educators and students remain. Overcoming these challenges requires ongoing support, investment, and collaboration among education stakeholders. The MATATAG curriculum presents an opportunity to enhance educational quality and equity in the Philippines, but sustained efforts are necessary to ensure successful implementation across all regions. Through equitable resource allocation, support for educators and students, and stakeholder collaboration, policymakers can maximize the benefits of the MATATAG curriculum and foster a brighter future for Filipino learners.
References
Acosta, I. C., & Acosta, A. S. (2017). A Mixed Methods Study on Teachers' Perceptions of Readiness of Higher Education Institutions to the Implementation of the K-12 Curriculum. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(7), 1215-1232.
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369-386.
Baker, B. D., Sciarra, D. G., & Farrie, D. (2014). Is school funding fair? A national report card. Education Law Center.
Cabansag, M. G. S. (2014). Impact statements on the K-12 science program in the enhanced basic education curriculum in provincial schools. Researchers World, 5(2), 29.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
DepEd. (2013). Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/DO_s2013_43.pdf
DepEd. (2023). MATATAG Curriculum. https://www.deped.gov.ph/matatag-curriculum/
Ednave, R., Gatchalian, V., Mamisao, J., Canuto, X. O., Caugiran, M. D., Ekid, J., ... & Balmeo, M. L. (2018). Problems and challenges encountered in the implementation of the K to 12 Curriculum: A synthesis. Retrieved from Academia: https://www. academia. edu/39704530/PROBLEMS_AND_CHALLENGES_ENCOUNTERED_IN_THE_IMPLEMENT ATION_OF_THE_K_TO_12_CURRICULUM_A_SYNTHESIS.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of educational research, 74(1), 59-109.
Fullan, M. (2015). The new meaning of educational change. Teachers college press.
Gove, A. K., & Wetterberg, A. (Eds.). (2011). The early grade reading assessment: Applications and interventions to improve basic literacy. rti Press.
Guskey, T. R., & Yoon, K. S. (2009). What works in professional development?. Phi delta kappan, 90(7), 495-500.
Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. routledge.
Kilag, O. K., Jesus, J., Uy, F., Sasan, J. M., Seblos, K., & Gier, R. A. (2024). Educational Transformation: Perspectives on the Implementation of the Matatag Curriculum in the Philippines. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE), 1(5), 306-311.
Kilag, O. K., Andrin, G., Abellanosa, C., Villaver Jr, M., Uy, F., & Sasan, J. M. (2024). MATATAG Curriculum Rollout: Understanding Challenges for Effective Implementation. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE), 1(5), 172-177.
Le, C., Wolfe, R. E., & Steinberg, A. (2014). The Past and the Promise: Today's Competency Education Movement. Students at the Center: Competency Education Research Series. Jobs For the Future.
Marzano, R. J., & Marzano, J. S. (2003). The key to classroom management. Educational leadership, 61(1), 6-13.
Miao, Z., Bokhove, C., Reynolds, D., & Charalambous, C. Y. (2022). Rational numbers and proportional reasoning in Chinese primary schools: Patterns, latent classes, and reasoning processes. Asian Journal for Mathematics Education, 1(4), 408-436.
Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Kelly, D. L., & Fishbein, B. (2020). TIMSS 2019 international results in mathematics and science.
OECD, P. (2019). Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do, PISA.
Philippine News Agency. (2023). DepEd: Teachers, learners “receptive” to MATATAG Curriculum. https://www.pna.gov.ph/index.php/articles/1210540
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford publications.
SEAMEO INNOTECH. (2012). K to 12 Toolkit: Resource Guide for Teacher Educators
Sturgis, C., & Casey, K. (2018). Designing for Equity: Leveraging Competency-Based Education to Ensure All Students Succeed. CompetencyWorks Final Paper. iNACOL.
Tirol, S. L. (2022). Spiral Progression Approach in the Kto 12 Science Curriculum: A Literature Review. International Journal of Education (IJE), 10(4).
UNESCO. (2019). Education for Sustainable Development: A Roadmap. Paris: UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/sustainable-development/education
UNESCO. (2020). Education in a Post-COVID World: Nine Ideas for Public Action. Paris: UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373717
Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and teacher education, 24(1), 80-91.
World Bank. (2018). Philippines: Learning Poverty Brief. World Bank Group. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099000207152223103/pdf/IDU002b5536c0db4104ec3087d809906ec2eae56.pdf
