Bridging the Achievement Gap: Insights from PISA on Improving Mathematics Education in the Philippines

Authors

  • Osias Kit T. Kilag PAU Excellencia Global Academy Foundation, Inc., Mercado St., Poblacion, Toledo City, Philippines Author
  • Clarita R. Porio Department of Education, Cebu Province Division Author
  • Julanie L. Abella Department of Education, Schools Division of Toledo City Author
  • Millaine Mariel R. Ledesma Department of Education, Schools Division of Toledo City Author
  • Maria Flordelis R. Cabaluna PAU Excellencia Global Academy Foundation, Inc., Mercado St., Poblacion, Toledo City, Philippines Author
  • Leda T. Baluyot Caniff Liberty Academy, Hamtramck, Michigan, USA Author

Keywords:

Philippines, PISA, mathematics education, socio-economic factors, cultural factors, educational reforms

Abstract

This study examines the performance of Filipino students in mathematics as assessed by the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) in 2018 and 2022. Despite educational reforms and the introduction of the K to 12 curriculum, Filipino students have continued to underperform, with only marginal improvements in their PISA scores. The study identifies persistent challenges including socio-economic disparities, inadequate teaching practices, and cultural factors that impact student outcomes. Analysis reveals that socio-economic status significantly influences access to educational resources and support, contributing to achievement gaps. Educational practices, such as an emphasis on rote memorization over critical thinking, have limited the development of higher-order skills. Additionally, gender differences show that female students outperform males in mathematics, suggesting the need for gender-sensitive educational strategies. Recommendations include curriculum and instructional reforms, enhanced teacher professional development, targeted support for disadvantaged students, and a cultural shift towards fostering deep learning. Addressing these issues comprehensively is essential for improving mathematics education and closing the achievement gap in the Philippines. This study underscores the need for systemic change to better align educational practices with international standards and student needs.

References

Albert, J. R. G., Basillote, L. B., Alinsunurin, J. P., Vizmanos, J. F. V., Muñoz, M. S., & Hernandez, A. C. (2023). Sustainable Development Goal 4 on Quality Education for All: How Does the Philippines Fare and What Needs to Be Done?.

Albert, J. R. G., Dumagan, J. C., & Martinez Jr, A. (2015). Inequalities in income, labor, and education: The challenge of inclusive growth (No. 2015-01). PIDS Discussion Paper Series.

Bahena, R., Kilag, O. K., Andrin, G., Diano Jr, F., Unabia, R., & Valle, J. (2024). From Method to Equity: Rethinking Mathematics Assessment Policies in Education. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 2(1), 121-132.

Bernardo, A. B. (2008). Individual and social dimensions of Filipino students' achievement goals. International Journal of Psychology, 43(5), 886-891.

Breakspear, S. (2012). The policy impact of PISA: An exploration of the normative effects of international benchmarking in school system performance.

CASP. (2018). CASP Checklists. Retrieved from https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/

Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2013). The effectiveness of educational technology

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning policy institute.

DepEd. (2016). K to 12 Basic Education Curriculum. Department of Education, Philippines. https://www.deped.gov.ph/k-to-12/about/k-to-12-basic-education-curriculum/

Descartin, D. M., Kilag, O. K., Groenewald, E., Abella, J., Cordova Jr, N., & Jumalon, M. L. (2023). Curricular Insights: Exploring the Impact of Philippine K to 12 on PISA 2022 Reading Literacy Achievement. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 1(6), 334-342.

Estrada, M. J., & Gumban, J. (2024). School Heads’ Competence, Teachers’ Performance in the Light of Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers, and Students’ Academic Performance. Technium Sustainability, 6, 38-55.

Gutierez, S. B. (2019). Learning from teaching: Teacher sense-making on their research and school-based professional development. Issues in Educational Research, 29(4), 1181-1200.

Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2023). The knowledge capital of nations: Education and the economics of growth. MIT press.

Henderson, A. T., & Mapp, K. L. (2002). A new wave of evidence. The impact of school, family, and community connections on student achievement. Austin [Texas]: National Center for Family & Community: Connections with Schools.

Kaur, B. (2022). Mathematics teacher practice and student perception of how they learn mathematics in the context of Singapore. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 54(2), 387-402.

Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Technical report, EBSE Technical Report EBSE-2007-01.

Limjap, A. A., Santos, G. N. C., Lapinid, M. R. C., Roleda, L. S., & Anito, J. C. (2017). Gearing K to 12 Philippine Science for National Development and ASEAN Competitiveness. Advanced Science Letters, 23(2), 1068-1072.

Llurag, S., Kilag, O. K., Villanueva, K., Samutya, M., Rabi, J. I. I., & Kilag, J. (2024). Enhancing Mathematics Education in the Philippines: Addressing Challenges and Improving Instructional Quality through Professional Development. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE), 1(4), 190-196.

Nabayra, J. N. (2020). Video-Based E-Module for Mathematics in Nature and Students' Learning Experiences in a Flipped Classroom. Journal of Science & Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 43.

OECD. (2020). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2018-results-volume-i_5f07c754-en

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2023/12/pisa-2022-results-volume-i_76772a36.html

Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., & Groff, C. (2009). Effective programs in middle and high school mathematics: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 839-911.

Symaco, L. P. (2013). The Philippines: Education issues and challenges. Education in South East Asia, 191-212.

Vistro-Yu, C. P., & Verzosa, D. M. B. (2024). Navigating around marginalizing complexities: the case of mathematics teachers in the Philippines. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 1-12.

World Bank. (2021). Improving Student Learning Outcomes and Well-being in the Philippines: What Can We Learn from PISA?. World Bank Group. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/02dc4f0f-38b5-5fa0-9fbe-a6bb0a088bcd

Downloads

Published

2024-09-05

How to Cite

Kilag, O. K., Porio, C., Abella, J. . ., Ledesma, M. M. ., Cabaluna, M. F., & Baluyot, L. (2024). Bridging the Achievement Gap: Insights from PISA on Improving Mathematics Education in the Philippines. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE), 1(9), 53-62. https://risejournals.org/index.php/imjrise/article/view/633

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

Similar Articles

1-10 of 399

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.