Determining Factors of Blended Learning Success in Philippine Educational Institutions: A Discriminant Analysis
Keywords:
Blended learning, educational institutions, determining factors, infrastructure and technology masteryAbstract
This study investigated the determining factors of blended learning success in educational institutions in the Philippines. Through discriminant analysis, Infrastructure and Technology Mastery, Implementation Standards and Guidelines, Learning Strategy, as well as respondent status and learning environment were examined. The findings revealed that Infrastructure and Technology Mastery, Implementation Standards and Guidelines, and Learning Strategy significantly influenced blended learning success. Institutions investing in robust technological infrastructure, clear implementation guidelines, and diverse learning strategies achieved higher success rates. Surprisingly, respondent status and learning environment did not significantly impact success, indicating consistent perceptions across different groups and contexts. The study highlights the importance of effective implementation and resource provision in blended learning initiatives. Understanding these factors can guide educators and institutions in enhancing blended learning experiences for better student outcomes and educational effectiveness.
References
Abendan, C. F., Kilag, O. K., Uy, F., & Vestal, P. (2023). Transforming Learning in the Digital Age: The Confluence of Innovation and Education. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 1(5), 1-13.
Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 80-97.
Alvarez Jr, A. V. (2020). Learning from the Problems and Challenges in Blended Learning: Basis for Faculty Development and Program Enhancement. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(2), 112-132.
Cipriano, C., Kilag, O. K., Samutya, M., Macapobre, K., Villegas, M. A., & Suba-an, J. (2024). Physical Activity Interventions in Educational Settings: Effects on Academic Achievement Revisited. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE), 1(3), 238-246.
Dziuban, C. D., Hartman, J. L., & Moskal, P. D. (2004). Blended learning. Educause Center for Applied Research Bulletin, 2004(7), 1-44.
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The internet and higher education, 7(2), 95-105.
Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. John Wiley & Sons.
Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems. The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs, 1, 3-21.
Hapsari, S. R. Y., Azzahrawaani, Z., Nurazizah, A. S., Ismail, A., Ramdanis, G., Halimah, I. S., & Callista, L. A. Curricula. (2023). Learning approaches and strategies in online learning. Curricula: Journal of Curriculum Development
Klecka, W. R. (1980). Discriminant analysis (Vol. 19). Sage.
Malbas, M. H., Nengasca, M. K. S., Longakit, L. J. H., Celin, L. C., Pasigui, R., & Valenzona, M. A. V. N. (2023). Osias Kit T. Kilag. European Journal of Higher Education and Academic Advancement Volume, 1(2).
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers college record, 115(3), 1-47.
Nurhidayat, E., Mujiyanto, J., Yuliasri, I., & Hartono, R. (2024). Technology integration and teachers’ competency in the development of 21st-century learning in EFL classroom. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 18(2), 342-349.
Osguthorpe, R. T., & Graham, C. R. (2003). Blended learning environments. Quarterly review of distance education, 4(3).
Owston, R., York, D., & Murtha, S. (2013). Student perceptions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initiative. The internet and higher education, 18, 38-46.
Picciano, A. G. (2006). Blended learning: Implications for growth and access. Journal of asynchronous learning networks, 10(3), 95-102.
Porter, W. W., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. A., & Welch, K. R. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation. Computers & Education, 75, 185-195.
Ramadan, I. (2021). The Role of Using Blended Learning on English Language Learning for 9th graders from Teachers' Perspectives in Nablus Governorate (Doctoral dissertation, جامعة النجاح الوطنية).
Rovai, A. P., & Jordan, H. M. (2004). Blended learning and sense of community: A comparative analysis with traditional and fully online graduate courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 5(2), 1-13.
Taylor, J. C. (1995). Distance education technologies: The fourth generation. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 11(2).
Vaughan, N. (2007, January). Perspectives on blended learning in higher education. In International Journal on E-learning (Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 81-94). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Osias Kit T. Kilag, Antonina M. Llanos, Ryzel Maureen F. Canes, John Michael V. Sasan, Francisca T. Uy, Mary Aianne L. Villegas (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
