Filipino Learners: Exploring the New MATATAG Curriculum for Literacy and Numeracy
Keywords:
MATATAG Curriculum, literacy, numeracy, foundational skills, evidence-based approachesAbstract
The MATATAG Curriculum represents a significant advancement in Philippine education, aiming to enhance literacy and numeracy outcomes among Filipino learners. This research paper explores the key features and implications of the curriculum. Emphasizing foundational skills development, the curriculum focuses on phonological awareness, vocabulary, and basic mathematical concepts. It integrates evidence-based approaches such as phonics-based reading instruction and hands-on mathematical exploration. Furthermore, the curriculum supports Mother Tongue-Based Multilingual Education (MTB-MLE), recognizing the importance of learners' first language for literacy development. Continuous teacher training and community involvement are highlighted as crucial for successful implementation. The curriculum aims to address challenges in education by promoting inclusive practices and leveraging cultural and linguistic diversity. By fostering collaboration among stakeholders and promoting evidence-based teaching strategies, the New MATATAG Curriculum seeks to create a more equitable and effective educational system in the Philippines, ultimately empowering learners for success in school and beyond.
References
Aguilar, E., & Cohen, L. (2022). The PD book: 7 habits that transform professional development. John Wiley & Sons.
Bialystok, E. (2001). Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. Cambridge University Press.
Biemiller, A. (2005). Size and Sequence in Vocabulary Development: Implications for Choosing Words for Primary Grade Vocabulary Instruction.
Burton, L. A. (2013). Mother tongue-based multilingual education in the Philippines: Studying top-down policy implementation from the bottom up (Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota).
Cruz, J. (2023). Preservice Special Education Teachers in Collaborative Partnerships: Benefits and Challenges of Co-Teaching During Early Fieldwork. University of California, Los Angeles.
Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire (Vol. 23). Multilingual matters.
DepEd. (2023). MATATAG Curriculum. Department of Education, Philippines. https://www.deped.gov.ph/matatag-curriculum/
Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., ... & Japel, C. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental psychology, 43(6), 1428.
Epstein, J. L. (2018). School, family, and community partnerships in teachers’ professional work. Journal of Education for Teaching, 44(3), 397-406.
García, O. (2009). Education, multilingualism and translanguaging in the 21st century. Social justice through multilingual education, 143, 158.
García, O., & Wei, L. (2015). Translanguaging, bilingualism, and bilingual education. The handbook of bilingual and multilingual education, 223-240.
Gottardo, A., Chiappe, P., Yan, B., Siegel, L., & Gu, Y. (2006). Relationships between first and second language phonological processing skills and reading in Chinese‐English speakers living in English‐speaking contexts. Educational Psychology, 26(3), 367-393.
Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and teaching, 8(3), 381-391.
Henderson, A. T., & Mapp, K. L. (2002). A new wave of evidence. The impact of school, family, and community connections on student achievement. Austin [Texas]: National Center for Family & Community: Connections with Schools.
Kilag, O. K., Andrin, G., Abellanosa, C., Villaver Jr, M., Uy, F., & Sasan, J. M. (2024). MATATAG Curriculum Rollout: Understanding Challenges for Effective Implementation. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE), 1(5), 172-177.
Kilag, O. K., Galve, G., Uy, F., & Sasan, J. M. (2024). The New MATATAG Curriculum in the Lens of the 21st-Century 7Cs. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE), 1(5), 418-424.
Kilag, O. K., Jesus, J., Uy, F., Sasan, J. M., Seblos, K., & Gier, R. A. (2024). Educational Transformation: Perspectives on the Implementation of the Matatag Curriculum in the Philippines. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE), 1(5), 306-311.
Kilag, O. K., Hubahib Jr, S., & Sasan, J. M. (2024). Educational Transformation: The MATATAG Curriculum and Philippine Education Reform. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE), 1(5), 448-455.
Malecki, C. K., & Elliot, S. N. (2002). Children's social behaviors as predictors of academic achievement: A longitudinal analysis. School psychology quarterly, 17(1), 1.
National Reading Panel (US), National Institute of Child Health, & Human Development (US). (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2019). PISA 2018 Results: What Students Know and Can Do (Volume I). https://www.oecd.org/publications/pisa-2018-results-volume-i-5f07c754-en.htm
Ramírez, Y. G., Chávez, P. R., & Smagorinsky, P. (Eds.). (2020). Developing Culturally and Historically Sensitive Teacher Education: Global Lessons from a Literacy Education Program. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Reyes, J. R. S., Grajo, J. D., Comia, L. N., Talento, M. S. D., Ebal, L. P. A., & Mendoza, J. J. O. (2021). Assessment of Filipino Higher Education Students' Readiness for e-Learning During a Pandemic: A Rasch Technique Application. Philippine Journal of Science, 150(3).
Santos, Y. T. (2022). Crafting an Infodemic Response through Information Literacy. Philippine Journal of Librarianship and Information Studies, 42(2), 24-32.
Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2009). Early childhood mathematics education research: Learning trajectories for young children. Routledge.
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (2013). Linguistic genocide in education--or worldwide diversity and human rights?. Routledge.
Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organization (SEAMEO). (2019). Southeast Asia Primary Learning Metrics 2019: Regional Report. https://www.seaplm.org/PUBLICATIONS/regional%20results/SEA-PLM%202019%20Main%20Regional%20Report.pdf
Souto‐Manning, M. (2016). Honoring and building on the rich literacy practices of young bilingual and multilingual learners. The Reading Teacher, 70(3), 263-271.
Tizard, B., & Hughes, M. (2008). Young children learning. John Wiley & Sons.
Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Rose, E., Lindamood, P., Conway, T., & Garvan, C. (1999). Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. Journal of Educational psychology, 91(4), 579.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2000). Differentiation of Instruction in the Elementary Grades. ERIC Digest.
UNESCO. (2016). If you don’t understand, how can you learn? Global Education Monitoring Report. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000243713
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
