TACTILE TEACHING STRATEGIES: CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING IN GRADE 10 SCIENCE

Authors

  • Armando L. Marsan Deped-Cebu Province/University of the Visayas Author

Keywords:

TACTILE TEACHING STRATEGIES, CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING, GRADE 10 SCIENCE

Abstract

This study investigated the effectiveness of tactile teaching strategies in enhancing the conceptual understanding of Grade 10 Science learners. As it was anchored in Kolb’s Experiential Learning Theory, Bruner’s Discovery Learning and Theory of Instruction, and Constructivist principles, this study used a quantitative quasi-experimental one-group pretest and posttest design involving five intact classes consisting of 210 learners of Bitoon National Vocational High School, Dumanjug, Cebu. All data were collected using a validated assessment instrument and analyzed through descriptive and inferential statistics. The results confirmed that learners showed various perceptual learning styles, with auditory and visual preferences being the most preferred. The pretest findings showed that all participants were at the Beginning Proficiency Level, indicating limited background information and prior knowledge about the concept. After the implementation of the intervention, posttest scores significantly improved, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) and a large effect size observed (Cohen’s d = 2.90). However, no significant differences were found in posttest performance when grouped according to their perceptual learning styles, suggesting that learning preferences did not significantly influence learners’ academic learning outcomes. These findings indicated that tactile teaching strategies effectively enhance conceptual understanding regardless of learners’ preferred learning modalities. The study also emphasized the value of multimodal, scaffolded, and experiential instructional approaches incorporating tactile teaching strategies in Science education and designing an enhanced lesson exemplar to guide teachers in creating meaningful learning experiences that support conceptual development.

References

Abella, C.R.G., Anoling, K.M., Cagatao, P.P.S., & Bautista, R.G. (2024). Modelling the interplay of Science Teaching dimensions from the lenses of Science Educators. American Journal of Educational Research, 12(4), 159- 163 https://doi.org/10.12691/education-12-4-5

Acut, D.B. (2024). Addressing misconceptions in science through inquiry based instruction. International Journal of STEM Education, 11(1), Article 15 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00415-3

Adlaon, M.S. & Laid, S.M. (2025). A systematic review of innovative teaching strategies in Science: Exploring hands- on learning, technology integration, and student-centered approaches. Acta Pedagogia Asiana, 4(2), 101- 114. https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v4i2.2645

Bruner, J.S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review (Retrieved from https://digitalauthorship.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/the act of discovery-bruner.pdf

Cook, V. (2009). Second language learning and language teaching (4th ed.) Hodder Education.

Davis, B.G. (2007). Tools for teaching (2nd ed.). Jossey–Bass. https://cft.vanderbilt.edu

Department of Education. (2016). K to 12 Curriculum Guide in Science (Grade 7-10). Philippines

Domingo, J.T., & Barrot, J.S. (2021). English language teaching in the Philippines during COVID-19: Challenges and innovations. Issues in Educational Research, 31(3), 676-694

Eddy, S.L. (2020). Recent research on active learning in STEM classrooms. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 19(3), fe5. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-04-0064

Feirreira, F.M., & Vasconcelos, C. (2020). The impact of multisensory instruction on geosciences learning and students’ motivation. Geosciences, 10(11), 467. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences

Gilakjani, A.P. (2020). Visual, auditory, kinesthetic learning styles and their impacts on English language teaching. Journal of studies in Education, 10(1), 104-113

Irigoyen, J.J., Larrea, I., & Graña, M. (2024). Multisensory learning and its effects on Student engagement and retention. Sensors, 24(1), 6946. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24216946

Ji, Q. (2024). Using hands-on learning video assignments in online and in-person contexts. A longitudinal study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/xxxxxx

Kibga, C.M. (2021). Effectiveness of hands-on activities in developing students’ learning in Chemistry. International Journal of Academic Research and Reflection, 9(4), 66-78

Masood, A. (2023). Effect of activity-based teaching on students’ achievement in Physics at the Secondary School Level. Pakistan Journal of Education, 40(2), 97-114. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/pje.2023.40.2.97

Matazu, S. & Isma’il, A. (2024). Theoretical Frameworks and Empirical Evidence of Tactile Learning Style as a variable tool for Improving Biology Performance among Secondary School Students. Journal of Learning and Educational Policy. https://doi.org/10.55529/jlep.44.10.20

Nwosu, S.N., Etiubon, R.U., & Ofem, I.B. (2023). Exploring the benefits of activity-based learning in enhancing cognitive skills of Secondary School Science & Technology students. European Journal of Education Studies.

Organization for Economic Co-operation & Development. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume 1): The State of Learning & Equity in Education. OECD Printing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en

Piaget, J. (1952). The Origins of Intelligence in children. International University Press. Reid, J.M. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 21(1), 87-111. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586356

Rhouma, W.B. (2016). The relationship between perceptual learning styles preferences and academic achievement. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 9(2), 479-492.

Shao, F., Li, H., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Video watching and hands-on experiments to learn Science: A comparative analysis. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-024-00103-x

Twizeyimana, E. (2024). Teaching and learning Science as inquiry: An outlook of inquiry-based approaches and their classroom effects. International Journal of Science Education and Practice.

Webb, M., Tracey, M., Harwin, W., Tokatli, O., Hwang, F., Johnson, R., Barrett, N., & Jones, C. (2022). Haptic-enabled collaborative learning in virtual reality for schools. Education and Information Technology, 27(8), 11211- 11232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10639-4

Xiang, L. & Srinivasan, M. (2023). A hands-on activity to understand the nature of science and authentic scientific inquiry in large laboratory courses: What’s in the Box? Journal of College Science Teaching, 52(5).

Yilmaz, M.M. (2024). The impact of hands-on activities on children’s motivation in Science. International Journal of Early Childhood Education Research, 12(4), 45-59

Yunzal Jr., A.N. (2024). Exploring active learning strategies in Science: Classroom studies and implications. Science Education International, 35(4), 369-385

Downloads

Published

2026-06-22

How to Cite

Marsan, A. (2026). TACTILE TEACHING STRATEGIES: CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING IN GRADE 10 SCIENCE. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE), 4(4), 113-125. https://risejournals.org/index.php/imjrise/article/view/1699