ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AT ANG AKADEMIKONG PAGGANAP SA FILIPINO NG MGA MAG-AARAL: TAM MODEL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15858189Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, akademikong pagganap, Filipino, TAM Model, teknolohiya sa edukasyonAbstract
Layunin ng pag-aaral na ito na suriin ang ugnayan sa pagitan ng pananaw at paggamit ng Artificial Intelligence at ang akademikong pagganap sa asignaturang Filipino ng mga mag-aaral sa ikasampung baitang ng Balamban National High School-Evening Opportunity Class, Taong Panuruan 2024-2025. Ang disenyong ginamit sa pananaliksik ay ang deskriptibong-korelasyonal at sinuri ang datos gamit ang Shapiro-Wilk test, mean, standard deviation, at Kendall’s Tau-b. Batay sa naging resulta ng pag-aaral, natuklasan na ang aktwal na paggamit ng Artificial Intelligence ay may makabuluhang ugnayan sa ilang aspeto ng Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) tulad ng perceived usefulness at behavioral intention. Gayunpaman, tanging ang perceived usefulness lamang ang nagpakita ng makabuluhang ugnayan sa pagitan nito sa akademikong pagganap. Ipinapakita mula sa resulta na bagama’t positibo ang pananaw ng mga mag-aaral sa Artificial Intelligence ay hindi ito direktang nagpapabuti sa kanilang pagganap sa asignaturang Filipino. Sa kabuuan, iminumungkahi ng pag-aaral ang paglinang ng mga estratehiya upang maipakita ang aktwal na gamit ng Artificial Intelligence sa mga gawaing pangwika sa mga mag-aaral.
References
Aljarrah E, Elrehail E, Aababneh B, (2016). E-voting in Jordan: Assessing readiness and developing a system. Computer in human Behavior, 63, 860-867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.076
Altememy, H. A., Mohammed, B. A., Hsony, M. K., Hassan, A. Y., Mazhair, R., Dawood, I. I., ... & Sharif, H. R. (2023). The influence of the artificial intelligence capabilities of higher education institutions in Iraq on students’ academic performance: The role of AI-based technology application as a mediator. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 104(104), 267-282. DOI: 10.14689/ejer.2023.104.015
Bancoro, J. C. (2024). The relationship between artificial intelligence (AI) usage and academic performance of business administration students. International Journal of Asian Business and Management, 3(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.55927/ijabm.v3i1.7876
Baruch, Y. (1999). Response rate in academic studies: A comparative analysis. Human Relations, 52(4), 421–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679905200401
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. Ieee Access, 8, 75264-75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
Chen, Y., Jensen, S., Albert, L. J., Gupta, S., & Lee, T. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) student assistants in the classroom: Designing chatbots to support student success. Information Systems Frontiers, 25(1), 161-182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10291-4
Cuyugan, C. (2024). The effect of Artificial Intelligence tools usage to the perceived learning of 2nd year communication students at Far Eastern University–Manila (Academic Year 2023–2024). International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 16(3), Article 1498
Dias, P. G. I., Marapana, R. A. U. J., Rathnayaka, R. M. U. S. K., Gayathri, S. M. D. S., Anuradha, N. G. D., Kananke, T. C., ... & Wickramaratne, N. M. (2023). Consumers’ knowledge, attitudes, and behavior regarding functional food products-a survey from selected areas of Sri Lanka. Journal of Agricultural Sciences–Sri Lanka, 18(1). https://jas.sljol.info/articles/10104/files/submission/proof/10104-1-36343-1-10-20230102.pdf
Emura, T., Sofeu, C., & Rondeau, V. (2021). Conditional copula models for correlated survival endpoints: Individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 30, 2634 - 2650. https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802211046390.
Huang, A. Y., Lu, O. H., & Yang, S. J. (2023). Effects of artificial intelligence–enabled personalized recommendations on learners’ learning engagement, motivation, and outcomes in a flipped classroom. Computers and Education, 194, 104684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104684
Huang, J., Saleh, S., & Liu, Y. (2021). A review on artificial intelligence in education. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2021-0077
Institute for Digital Research and Education. (n.d.). What does Cronbach’s alpha mean? UCLA: Statistical Consulting Group. https://stats.oarc.ucla.edu/spss/faq/what-does-cronbachs-alpha-mean
Lin, C. W., Lin, Y. S., Liao, C. C., & Chen, C. C. (2024). Do you have AI dependency? The roles of academic self-efficacy, academic stress, and performance expectations on problematic AI usage behavior. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00467-0
Kang L. (2023) Determinants of College Students’ Actual Use of AI-Based Systems: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Sustainability, 15(6), 5221. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065221
Gustilo, L. E. (2013). An analysis of writer’s performance, resources, and idea generation processes: the case of Filipino engineering students. Language Testing in Asia, 3(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/2229-0443-3-2
Lopres, J. R., Placencia Jr., M. C., Lopres, G. M., Tidalgo, G. M., Aguirre, M. M., Masongsong, J. M., & Sombrio, R. P. (2023). Strategies in Teaching Academic Essay Writing, Level of Effectiveness, and Instructional Barriers: The Case of Filipino Learners. World Journal of English Language, 13(6), 42–58. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v13n6p42
Mallillin, L. L. D., & Mallillin, J. B. (2019). Competency skills and performance level of faculties in the higher education institution (HEI). European Journal of Education Studies, 6(9), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.2746
Mallillin, L. L. D., Mallillin, J. B., Ampongan, Y. D., Lipayon, I. C., Mejica, M. M., & Burabo, J. Z. (2023). Instructional design for effective classroom pedagogy of teaching. Eureka, 1(2), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.56773/ejer.v1i2.6
Mallillin, L. L. D. (2024). Artificial Intelligence (AI) Towards Students’ Academic Performance. Innovare Journal of Education, 12(4), Article 51665. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijoe.2024v12i4.51665
Møgelvang, A., Bjelland, C., Grassini, S., & Ludvigsen, K. (2024). Gender Differences in the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in Higher Education: Characteristics and Consequences. Education Sciences, 14(12), 1363. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121363
Pedro, F., Subosa, M., Rivas, A., & Valverde, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000366994?posInSet=22&queryId=9d8ca6cf-6a26-4f09-9b10-5e339c0e75da
Rilveria, J. R. C. (2018). The development of the Filipino coping strategies scale. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review, 18(1), 9. https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1151&context=apssr
Roll, I., & Wylie, R. (2016). Evolution and revolution in artificial intelligence in education. International journal of artificial intelligence in education, 26, 582-599. DOI:10.1007/s40593-016-0110-3
Van Den Berg, R. (n.d.). SPSS Shapiro-Wilk Test – Quick Tutorial with Example. SPSS TUTORIALS. https://www.spss-tutorials.com/spss-shapiro-wilk-test-for-normality/
Wicklin, R. (2023, April 5). Weak or Strong? How to interpret a Spearman or Kendall correlation. SAS Blogs. https://blogs.sas.com/content/iml/2023/04/05/interpret-spearman-kendall-corr.html
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 SONAYA S. MANONGGIRING, MIRAFLOR I. SALDUA (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
