PAGGAMIT NG GENERATIVE AI SA KASANAYANG PAGSULAT SA FILIPINO NG MGA MAG-AARAL SA JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15849382Keywords:
Generative AI, pagsulat, Technology Acceptance ModelAbstract
Ang ademikong pagsulat ay isa sa pangunahing kasanayan sa komunikasyon pasulat na mahalagang matutunan upang maging epektibo at makabuluhan ang pakikipag-ugnayan sa iba. Sa makabagong panahon ng digital na teknolohiya, ang paggamit ng generative AI upang mapabuti ang kasanayang ito ay nagiging mahalaga. Nilalayon ng pag-aaral na ito na palawakin ang umiiral na kaalaman ukol sa aplikasyon ng generative artificial intelligence (genAI) sa pag-unlad ng wika, partikular sa larangan ng akademikong pagsulat na isinagawa sa B. Durano Integrated School sa ilalim ng Departamento ng Edukasyon na Sangay ng Lungsod ng Danao. Ang pananaliksik na ito ay gumamit ng deskriptibong korelasyonal na disenyo upang maipakita ang pananaw at kaugnayan ng paggamit ng generative AI sa paglinang ng kasanayan sa pagsulat gamit ang Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Layunin ng pag-aaral na suriin ang mga salik na may impluwensiya sa paggamit ng generative AI habang tinitiyak ang pagiging pribado ng mga kalahok, pagtataguyod ng pagkapantay-pantay, at paglikha ng isang mapangalaga na kapaligiran para sa pananaliksik. Gamit ang jamovi software, sinuri ang mga datos na nakalap mula sa 124 na mag-aaral sa sekondarya sa pamamagitan ng isang online questionnaire. Batay sa isinagawang pag-aaral, lumitaw na positibo ang pananaw ng mga mag-aaral hinggil sa paggamit ng generative AI sa pagsusulat ng akademikong komposisyon sa Filipino. Nakita nilang ito ay kapaki-pakinabang at madaling gamitin, kaya’t umusbong din ang kanilang positibong saloobin at intensyon na gamitin ito sa mga gawaing akademiko. Gayunman, natuklasan ding hindi pa lubos ang kanilang aktwal na paggamit ng teknolohiyang ito na maaaring bunga ng kakulangan sa karanasan, kaalaman, at oportunidad. Napatunayan din na may ugnayan ang mga pananaw, saloobin, at intensyon ng mga mag-aaral sa kanilang aktwal na kilos. Samantala, ang saloobin at kadalian sa paggamit ay may mahalagang papel bilang tagapamagitan sa ugnayan ng nakikitang pakinabang ng generative AI at aktwal na paggamit nito. Sa kabuuan, ipinapakita ng pag-aaral na ang matagumpay na paggamit ng generative AI sa akademikong konteksto ay hindi lamang nakasalalay sa teknikal na kahusayan, kundi sa pagpapalakas ng positibong pananaw, saloobin, at suporta mula sa institusyon. Ang pagtutok sa mga salik na ito ay makatutulong upang higit na maging kapaki-pakinabang at epektibo ang generative AI bilang katuwang sa makabagong pagkatuto.
References
Aljanabi, A., Almaiah, M., & Al-Khasawneh, A. (2023). Exploring students’ acceptance of ChatGPT in academic writing: An extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) approach. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11931-7
Aljuaid, H. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence tools on academic writing instruction in higher education: A systematic review. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on ChatGPT. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4814342
Alzubi, A. A. F. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence in the EFL writing context: Students' literacy in perspective. Qubahan Academic Journal, 4(2), 59-69. https://journal.qubahan.com/index.php/qaj/article/view/506
Amal Mohammad, H. A. (2023). Determinants of intention to use ChatGPT for Professional development among Omani EFL pre-service teachers. International Journal of Learning, Teaching, and Educational Research, 22(12), 187-209. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.12.10
Ashley-Osuzoka, J., Lord Nyame, Marfo-Ahenkorah, E., Abrahams, A., Godswill Ashong, & Aboagye, D. (2024). Generative Artificial Intelligence in Corporate America: A Review of Artificial Intelligence Use, Benefits, Challenges, Regulation and Cyber Security Issues. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202409.1557.v1
Bomer, Katherine (2021). Leaving behind the “Learning Loss”: Loving and Learning from the Ways Students Talk, Write, and Draw Right Now, Language Arts, http://dx.doi.org/10.58680/la202131334
Bonsu, E. M., & Baffour-Koduah, D. (2023). From the consumers’ side: Determining students’perception and intention to use ChatGPT in Ghanaian higher education. Journal of Education, Society& Multiculturalism, 4(1), 1-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/jesm-2023-0001
Chan, C.K.Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(43). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
Che Siti Lazrina Md Lazim, Nur Diyana Ismail & Mohd Danial Afiq Khamar Tazilah. (2021). Application of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) towards online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: Accounting students’ perspective. International Journal of Business, Economics, and Law, 24(1). 13-20. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349214593_application_of_technology_acceptance_model_tam_towards_online_learning_during_covid19_pandemic_accounting_students_perspective
Costa, K., Ntsobi, P. M., & Mfolo, L. (2024). Challenges, benefits and recommendations for using generative artificial intelligence in academic writing–a case of ChatGPT. Medicon Engineering Themes. https://themedicon.com/pdf/engineeringthemes/MCET-07-236.pdf
Dangin, D., & Hikmah, I. (2023). The Potential Uses and Missuses of AI-Powered Writing Skills on Academic Writing: Students' Side. Journal of Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v7i1.7709
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of
information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Druga, S., Vu, S. T., Likhith, E., & Qiu, T. (2019). Inclusive AI literacy for kids around
the world. Proceedings of FabLearn 2019. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311890.3311904
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, D. L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., ... & Williams, M. D. (2023). Adoption, Use and Impact of Artificial Intelligence Tools in Higher Education: A Literature Review and Future Research Agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 70, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102642
Egunjobi, J. P., & AD, P. D. D. (2024). Artificial Intelligence and Academic Writing: A Global Exploration of Students Perceptions and Attitudes. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Joyzy-Pius Egunjobi/publication/387216937_Artificial_Intelligence_and_Academic_Writing_A_Global_Exploration_of_Students_Perceptions_and_Attitudes/links/6764102c7784cf161e0b5518/Artificial-Intelligence-and-Academic-Writing-A-Global-Exploration-of-Students-Perceptions-and-Attitudes.pdf
Ekundayo, Samuel and Arasanmi, Chris Niyi, "Drivers of generative AI acceptance in anODFL institution through the lens of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)" (2024). ACIS 2024 Proceedings. 147. https://aisel.aisnet.org/acis2024/147
Escalante, J., Pack, A., & Barrett, A. (2023). AI-generated feedback on writing: insights into efficacy and ENL student preference. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(57). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00425-2
Fabro, R. B. B., Rivera, J. C., Sambrano, L. C., Dinoy, L. J. M., Alcozer, N. G., & Agustin, M. C. (2024). Perceptions and Extent of Utilization of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) among Filipino Students. International Journal of Education and Research, 12(7), 107-126. http://www.ijern.com/journal/2024/July-2024/09.pdf
Fontanilla, J. B., Bautista, K. H., Lactao Jr, M., Villacorte, M. A., & Santos, R. (2023). Educators' Perspectives on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Writing Competence. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Publications, 6(6), 29-34. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ramil-Santos-2/publication/375769974_Educators'_Perspectives_on_the_Impact_of_Artificial_Intelligence_on_Writing_Competence/links/655bfe6fb86a1d521bfabddd/Educators-Perspectives-on-the-Impact-of-Artificial-Intelligence-on-Writing-Competence.pdf
Hadi, Nur & Mohamad, Faizah & Md Johar, Elia & abdul kadir, Zaemah. (2024). Exploring the Acceptance of ChatGPT as an Assisting Tool in Academic Writing among ESL Undergraduate Students. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science. VIII. 2886-2901. 10.47772/IJRISS.2024.8100242. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385987497_Exploring_the_Acceptance_of_ChatGPT_as_an_Assisting_Tool_in_Academic_Writing_among_ESL_Undergraduate_Students
Hartley, S. (2023). More on AI-generated content. Current Psychiatry, 22(6). https://doi.org/10.12788/cp.0371
Hsiao, C. H., Wang, Y., & Lin, M. F. (2024). Teachers’ acceptance of AI-based writing assistants: An extended TAM approach. Computers & Education, 210, 104840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.104840
Ironsi, C.S., & Ironsi, S. (2024). Experimental evidence for the efficacy of generative AI in improving students’ writing skills. Quality Assurance in Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-04-2024-0065
Jabbarova, A. (2020). LEARNING A FOREIGN LANGUAGE IN NON-LANGUAGE INSTITUTIONS: THE FORMATION OF PROFESSIONAL FOREIGN LANGUAGE COMPETENCE. 1(1), 42–46. https://ruslit.jdpu.uz/index.php/fll/article/view/11
Joo, S. H. (2024). Generative AI as Writing or Speaking Partners in L2 Learning: Implications for Learning-Oriented Assessments. Studies in Applied Linguistics &
TESOL, 24(1), 54-59. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1435671
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchenhoff, H., et al. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102221
Kohnke, L., Jarrell, D., & Zou, D. (2023). Exploring student engagement with AI-powered writing tools: Awareness, usage, and challenges. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100136
Laksana, I. P. Y., Hudiananingsih, P. D., Suciani, K., Virginiya, P. T., & Wahyuni, L. G.E. (2024, October). Exploring the Possible Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Supporting Students’ Speaking Performance. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Riset Bahasa dan Pengajaran Bahasa (Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 208-218). https://ojs2.pnb.ac.id/index.php/SENARILIP/article/view/2219
Lee, T., Yamaguchi, T., & Morimoto, Y. (2024). VALIDATION OF A SELF LEARNING METHOD FOR SECOND-LANGUAGE WRITING USING GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. In ICERI2024 Proceedings (pp. 9561-9569). IATED. https://library.iated.org/view/LEE2024VAL
Li, Q., Wang, Y., & Yu, Z. (2023). Exploring the impact of AI writing tools on EFL students’ writing performance and perceptions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100158
Lin, M. P.-C., Liu, A. L., Poitras, E., Chang, M., & Chang, D. H. (2024). An Exploratory Study on the Efficacy and Inclusivity of AI Technologies in Diverse Learning Environments. Sustainability, 16(20), 8992–8992. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16208992
Liu, G. & Ma, C. (2023). Measuring EFL learners’ use of ChatGPT in informal digital learning of English based on the technology acceptance model. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching,17(4), 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2023.224031
Marikyan, D.& Papagiannidis, S. (2024) Technology Acceptance Model: A review. In S. Papagiannidis (Ed), TheoryHub Book. Available at https://open.ncl.ac.uk ISBN:9781739604400, https://open.ncl.ac.uk/theory-library/technology-acceptance-model.pdf
Mohammad Taufiq Abdul Ghani, Mahizer Hamzah, Saipolbarin Ramli, Wan Ab Aziz Wan Daud, Taj Rijal Muhammad Romli, Nur Najihah Mohamad Mokhtar. (2019). Questionnaire-based approach on Technology Acceptance Model for mobile digital game-based learning. Journal of Global Businessand Social Entrepreneurship, 5(14). 11-21. http://gbse.my/V5%20NO.14%20(MARCH%202019)/Paper-199-.pdf
Mohajan, H. (2020). Quantitative research: A successful investigation in natural and social sciences. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 9(4), 52-79. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/105149/
Nurul Qistina Baharuddin & Harwati Hashim. (2020). Using digital reading in ESL Malaysian Primary classrooms: The strengths and the shortcomings from the learners’ perspectives. Journal of Educational and Learning Studies, 3(1), 7-13. https://doi.org/10.32698/0832
Park, S. (2023). Adoption of AI-assisted writing tools in higher education: An extended TAM model. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11614-9
Park, Y. (2009). An analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model in understanding university students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 150–162.
Peter, L. (2024). Keeping Students Connected to the Power of Language: Developing Writing Skills in Adolescents in an Age of Generative AI. https://arcabc.ca/islandora/object/tru%3A6534/
Pham, T., Yang, L., & Nguyen, H. (2023). Investigating the use of ChatGPT in academic writing by non-native English speakers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(3), 751–770. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331231161256
Ramayah, T., & Aafaqi, B. (2004). Role of self-efficacy and perceived usefulness in predicting perceived ease of use. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 17(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2004.tb00100.x
Tai, T. Y., & Chen, H. H. J. (2024). Improving elementary EFL speaking skills with generative AI chatbots: Exploring individual and paired interactions. Computers & Education, 220,105112.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036013152400126X
Teng, M. F., & Wang, C. (2023). Assessing academic writing self‐efficacy belief and writing performance in a foreign language context. Foreign Language Annals, 56(1), 144–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12638
Teo, T., Noyes, J., & Scherer, R. (2019). The theory of planned behavior and technology acceptance: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 143, 103-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103-117
Wu, W., Zhang, B., Li, S., & Liu, H. (2022). Exploring factors of the willingness to accept AI assisted learning environments: An empirical investigation based on the UTAUT model and perceived risk theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(3), 78-81. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.870777
Zhai, X. (2022). ChatGPT as a Tool for Academic Writing: Student Perceptions and Attitudes. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 12345–12367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11479-0
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 SONNY REY M. CALVO, MIRAFLOR I. SALDUA (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
