Ethics in Everyday Governance: Bridging Philosophical Foundations and Participatory Practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15636453Keywords:
Ethical Governance, Virtue Ethics, Care Ethics, Participatory Research Ethics, Responsible InnovationAbstract
Ethics in everyday governance has become an essential concern in contemporary society, where public policy, social justice, and rapid technological advancements intersect. This paper critically explores how ethical principles—rooted in classical philosophy and expanded through modern ethical theories—inform and shape governance practices across multiple domains. Drawing on a systematic review of interdisciplinary literature, including sources from social work, philosophy, participatory research, and technology ethics, the study examines the normative foundations and practical implications of ethical governance. Special attention is given to virtue ethics, care ethics, participatory and community-based research ethics, and frameworks for responsible innovation. These perspectives highlight the significance of transparency, accountability, inclusivity, and reflexivity in fostering trust and legitimacy within institutions and policymaking. The findings reveal that ethical governance is not merely a regulatory function but a proactive, value-driven process that demands ongoing engagement with diverse stakeholders and attention to long-term societal impacts. In an age of increasing complexity, where governance must navigate both human and technological challenges, embedding ethical integrity in everyday practices is crucial to sustaining democratic ideals and promoting the common good.
References
Aristotle. (1954). The Nichomachean ethics of Aristotle (Sir David Ross, Trans.). London: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 350 BCE)
Banks, S. (2012a). Ethics. In S. Becker, A. Bryman, & H. Ferguson (Eds.), Understanding research for social policy and social work (2nd ed., pp. 56–59). Bristol: The Policy Press.
Banks, S. (2012b). Global ethics for social work? In S. Banks & K. Nøhr (Eds.), Practising social work ethics around the world: Cases and commentaries (pp. 1–31). London: Routledge.
Banks, S., & Gallagher, A. (2009). Ethics in professional life: Virtues for health and social care. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Baron, M. (1997). Kantian ethics. In M. Barron, P. Pettit, & M. Slote (Eds.), Three methods of ethics (pp. 3–91). Oxford: Blackwell.
Benneworth, P., Conway, C., Charles, D., Humphrey, L., & Younger, P. (2009). Characterizing modes of university engagement with wider society: A literature review and survey of best practice. Newcastle: Office of the Pro Vice Chancellor, Newcastle University.
Bietti, E. (2020). From ethics washing to ethics bashing: A view on tech ethics from within moral philosophy. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT ‘20)* (pp. 210–219). New York: ACM.
Boenink, M., & Kudina, O. (2020). Values in responsible research and innovation: From entities to practices. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 7(3), 450–470.
Brey, P. (2012). Anticipatory ethics for emerging technologies. NanoEthics, 6(1), 1–13.
Brey, P. (2017). Ethics of emerging technologies. In S. O. Hansson (Ed.), Methods for the ethics of technology (pp. 175–192). London: Rowman and Littlefield International.
Cancian, F. (1993). Conflicts between activist research and academic success: Participatory research and alternative strategies. American Sociologist, 24(1), 92–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02691947
Cargo, M., Delormier, T., Levesque, L., Horn-Miller, K., McComber, A., & Macaulay, A. (2008). Can the democratic ideal of participatory research be achieved? An inside look at an academic-indigenous community partnership. Health Education Research, 23(5), 904–914. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cym077
Centre for Social Justice and Community Action (CSJCA), Durham University and National Coordinating Centre for Public Engagement (NCCPE). (2012). Community-based participatory research: A guide to ethical principles and practice. Bristol: NCCPE. Retrieved December 1, 2012, from www.publicengagement.ac.uk/how-we-help/our-publications/community-based-participatory-research-guide-to-ethical-principle
Couzos, S., Culbong, M., Lea, T., & Murray, R. (2005). ‘We are not just participants – we are in charge’: The NACCHO ear trial and the process for aboriginal community-controlled health research. Ethnicity & Health, 10(2), 91–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/13557850500071038
Dodson, L., Piatelli, D., & Schmalzbauer, L. (2007). Researching inequality through interpretive collaborations: Shifting power and the unspoken contract. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(6), 821–843. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800407304458
Durham Community Research Team. (2011). Community-based participatory research: Ethical challenges. Retrieved October 10, 2012, from www.dur.ac.uk/resources/beacon/CCDiscussionPapertemplateCBPRBanksetal7Nov2011.pdf
European Commission. (2021). The European Commission’s priorities: 6 Commission priorities for 2019–24. https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024_en
Fine, M., Weis, L., Weseen, S., & Wong, M. (2000). For whom? Qualitative research, representations and social responsibilities. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (pp. 107–132). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Flicker, S., & Guta, A. (2008). Ethical approaches to adolescent participation in sexual health research. Journal of Adolescent Health, 42(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.07.017
Floridi, L. (2018). Soft ethics and the governance of the digital. Philosophy & Technology, 31(1), 1–8.
Franssen, M., Lokhorst, G. J., & van de Poel, I. (2018). Philosophy of technology. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/technology
Green, B. (2021). The contestation of tech ethics: A sociotechnical approach to ethics and technology in action. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3859358
Greenwood, D., & Levin, M. (2001). Pragmatic action research and the struggle to transform universities into learning communities. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 103–113). London: Sage.
Hart, A., Maddison, E., & Wolff, D. (2007). Community-university partnership in practice. Leicester: NIACE.
Held, V. (2006). The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heron, J., & Reason, P. (2008). Extending epistemology within a cooperative inquiry. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 366–380). London: Sage.
Horn, K., McCracken, L., Dino, G., & Braybot, M. (2008). Applying community-based participatory research principles to the development of a smoking-cessation program for American Indian teens: ‘Telling our story’. Health Education and Behaviour, 44, 44–69.
Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389–399.
Pitt, J. C. (2014). ‘Guns don’t kill, people kill’; Values in and/or around technologies. In P. Kroes & P. P. Verbeek (Eds.), The moral status of technical artefacts (pp. 89–102). Dordrecht: Springer.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Joy Cartagena Maagad, Romeo Gantuangco Aton, Sr., Fredelio Basa Bagnes, Claro Acedo Lozada, Benson Digaw-a Leleng, Nestor Lapanio Manginsay, Alfeo Galvadores Piloton (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.