Future School Leaders: A Study on the Strategies and Philosophies of Mentoring Principals

Authors

  • Joseph L. Torres Sto.Niño High School, Tanjay City Division, Negros Oriental, Philippines Author
  • Emelie S. Magalso Pilipigan Indigenous People Integrated School (Lourdes Ledesma Del Prado Memorial National High School Ext.), Tanjay City Division, Negros Oriental, Philippines Author
  • Tina Marie T. Fernandez Bulo Elementary School, Tanjay City Division, Negros Oriental, Philippines Author
  • Rowela M. Saycon Canghatap Elementary School, Tanjay City Division, Negros Oriental, Philippines Author
  • Mila A. Real Rosario V. Moras Memorial School, Tanjay City, Negros Oriental, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15605528

Keywords:

Mentoring, Educational Leadership, Leadership Development, Communities of Practice

Abstract

This study explores the strategic role of mentoring in cultivating future educational leaders within school settings. Drawing from Social Learning Theory (Bandura, 1977) and the concept of communities of practice, the research highlights how structured mentorship promotes professional growth, fosters leadership identity, and enhances organizational resilience. Through an analysis of relevant literature and best practices, the study underscores the impact of intentional mentoring on both individual and institutional development. It also examines the significance of distributed leadership and boundary crossing (Akkerman & Bakker, 2011) in fostering collaborative environments where mentees engage in both teaching and leadership roles. Emphasis is placed on how mentorship, when aligned with supportive policies and embedded in school culture, can lead to sustainable leadership pipelines. The findings advocate for institutionalizing mentorship through policies that allocate time, training, and resources to ensure its effectiveness. Ultimately, the study argues that school leaders who mentor emerging educators leave behind a legacy of innovation, collaboration, and continuous improvement, thereby reinforcing the school's capacity to thrive in complex educational landscapes.

References

Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311404435

Ash, R. C., & Persall, J. M. (2000). The principal as chief learning officer: Developing teacher leaders. NASSP Bulletin, 84(616), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263650008461604

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Bogler, R., & Nir, A. E. (2012). The importance of teachers’ perceived organizational support to job satisfaction: What’s empowerment got to do with it? Journal of Educational Administration, 50(3), 287–306. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231211223310

Bogler, R., & Somech, A. (2004). Influence of teacher empowerment on teachers’ organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(3), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.02.003

Borg, S. (2015). Teacher research for professional development. In G. Pickering & P. Gunashekar (Eds.), Innovation in English language teacher education (pp. 23–28). British Council.

Brimdyr, K. (2002). Lactation management: A community of practice. In K. Cadwell (Ed.), Reclaiming breastfeeding for the United States (pp. 51–63). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Bush, T. (2009). Leadership development and school improvement: Contemporary issues in leadership development. Educational Review, 61(4), 375–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910903403956

Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237

Carter, K., & Doyle, W. (1995). Teacher-researcher relationships in the study of teaching and teacher education. Peabody Journal of Education, 70(2), 162–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/01619569509538829

Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). The teacher research movement: A decade later. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X028007015

Cooper, K. S., Stanulis, R. N., Brondyk, S. K., Hamilton, E. R., Macaluso, M., & Meier, J. A. (2016). The teacher leadership process: Attempting change within embedded systems. Journal of Educational Change, 17(1), 85–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-015-9262-4

Criswell, B. A., Rushton, G. T., Nachtigall, D., Staggs, S., Alemdar, M., & Cappelli, C. J. (2018). Strengthening the vision: Examining the understanding of a framework for teacher leadership development by experienced science teachers. Science Education, 102(6), 1265–1287. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21472

Curtin, N., Malley, J., & Stewart, A. J. (2016). Mentoring the next generation of faculty: Supporting academic career aspirations among doctoral students. Research in Higher Education, 57, 714–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-015-9403-x

Daresh, J. (2004). Mentoring school leaders: Professional promise or predictable problems? Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(4), 495–517. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X04267114

Day, C. (2013). The new lives of teachers. In M. Flores, A. Carvalho, F. Ferreira, & M. Vilaca (Eds.), Back to the future (pp. 57–74). Brill Sense.

Dee, J. R., Henkin, A. B., & Duemer, L. (2003). Structural antecedents and psychological correlates of teacher empowerment. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(3), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230310474412

Dempsey, R. (1992). Teachers as leaders: Towards a conceptual framework. Teaching Education, 5(1), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047621920050114

Dimmock, C. (2016). Conceptualising the research–practice–professional development nexus: Mobilising schools as ‘research-engaged’ professional learning communities. Professional Development in Education, 42(1), 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.963884

Grissom, J. A., & Harrington, J. R. (2010). Investing in administrator efficacy: An examination of professional development as a tool for enhancing principal effectiveness. American Journal of Education, 116(4), 583–612. https://doi.org/10.1086/653631

Harris, S., Ballenger, J., & Leonard, J. (2004). Aspiring principal perceptions: Are mentor principals modeling standards-based leadership? Mentoring and Tutoring, 12(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361126042000239943

Meador, D. (2018). The role of the principal in schools. ThoughtCo. Retrieved from https://www.thoughtco.com/role-of-principal-in-schools-3194583

Merriam, S. B., & Bierema, L. L. (2014). Adult learning: Linking theory and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2017). Missouri code of state regulations, division 20, Division of Student Learning, chapter 400, Office of Educator Quality. Retrieved December 2017 from https://www.sos.mo.gov/cmsimages/adrules/csr/current/5csr/5c20-400.pdf

Downloads

Published

2025-06-06

How to Cite

Torres , J. ., Magalso, E., Fernandez, T. M., Saycon, R., & Real, M. (2025). Future School Leaders: A Study on the Strategies and Philosophies of Mentoring Principals. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE), 2(6), 88-97. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15605528