Educational Leadership Under Pressure: A Study on the Relationship Between Work Intensification and Leader Burnout
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15289108Keywords:
School Leadership, Paperwork Intensification, Multitasking, Administrative BurdenAbstract
This study examines the intensification of paperwork and multitasking among school leaders, highlighting how increased demands for accountability and administrative compliance have reshaped the leadership landscape. Drawing from recent literature, the findings reveal that while bureaucratic pressures have become an inevitable aspect of educational leadership, their negative impacts on leaders’ well-being are not unavoidable. A positive school climate—marked by trust, collaboration, and strong social support—emerges as a crucial moderating factor that can buffer the emotional and physical toll of heightened workloads. Conversely, environments characterized by weak professional relationships exacerbate stress and burnout among leaders. The study also underscores the often-invisible emotional labor involved in managing bureaucratic tasks, as leaders struggle to balance administrative demands with their core mission of fostering teaching and learning. This emotional strain poses a significant risk not only to individual leaders' mental health but also to the broader stability and effectiveness of schools. The paper concludes that systemic interventions, including school culture reforms, administrative streamlining, and professional development focused on resilience, are urgently needed. Supporting school leaders in these ways is essential for sustaining effective leadership and ensuring long-term educational excellence in increasingly complex school environments.
References
Akavov, R. (2012). Too much face and not enough books: The relationship between multiple indices of Facebook use and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.026
Ambrocio, H. (2007). Cognitive psychology (8th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Anderson, J., Dwyer, T., Dutra, R. S., Covic, A., Magalhaes, V. B., Ferreira, L. R. R., et al. (2008). Too much computer and internet use is bad for you, especially if you are young and poor: Results from the 2001 Brazilian SAEB. Computers and Education, 51, 1417–1429.
Bardshaw, A. (2012). Ubiquitous laptop usage in higher education: Effects on student achievement, student satisfaction, and constructivist measures in honors and traditional classrooms. Computers and Education, 51, 1766–1783.
Boehm Davis, D. A. (2008). Toward a theory of memory and attention.
Bonilla, B. (2015). Wireless internet use. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved January 3, 2018, from http://www.pewinternet.org/w/media// Files/Reports/2009/WirelessInternet-Use-With-Topline.pdf
Brasel, H., & Gipps, N. (2011). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 16, 220–244.
Brodmann, M. (2012). Validity of high-school grades in predicting student success beyond the freshman year: High-school record vs. standardized tests as indicators of four-year college outcomes. University of California/Berkeley Center for Studies in Higher Education. Research & Occasional Paper Series: CSHE.6.07.
Brunce, S. (2014). Digital inequality: From unequal access to differentiated use. In K. Neckerman (Ed.), Social inequality (pp. 355–400). Russell Sage Foundation.
Child Development Luciana. (2013). Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 276–297.
Cooper, J. (2014). Integrating computer technology in early childhood education environments: Issues raised by early childhood educators. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 54(2), 210–228.
Department of Education Order Number 16, series of 2009: Guidelines for the implementation of Civil Service Commission Resolution No. 080096 on working hours for public school teachers.
Dux, P. (2014). Succinct survey measures of web-use skills. Social Science Computer Review. Retrieved September 12, 2017, from http://webuse.org/p/a34
Fitzgerald, S., McGrath-Champ, S., Stacey, M., Wilson, R., & Gavin, M. (2019). Intensification of teachers’ work under devolution: A ‘tsunami’ of paperwork. Journal of Industrial Relations, 61(5), 613–636. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185618801396
Gafman, D. (2013). Search engine use. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved September 7, 2011, from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2008/Search-Engine-Use.aspx
Galvanni, L. (2015). Predictors of academic achievement and retention among college freshmen: A longitudinal study. College Student Journal, 38(1), 66–80.
Gavin, M., McGrath-Champ, S., Wilson, R., Fitzgerald, S., & Stacey, M. (2021). Teacher workload in Australia: National reports of intensification and its threats to democracy. In S. Riddle, A. Heffernan, & D. Bright (Eds.), New perspectives on education for democracy (1st ed., p. 14). Routledge.
Goodrac, M. (2015). Instant messaging in a context of virtual schooling: Balancing the affordances and challenges. Educational Media International, 45(1), 47–58.
Green, F. (2021). British teachers’ declining job quality: Evidence from the skills and employment survey. Oxford Review of Education, 47(3), 386–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2020.1847719
Howard, R. (2012). Technological influences on social ties across the lifespan. In K. Fingerman, C. Berg, T. Antonucci, & J. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of lifespan psychology (pp. 647–671). Springer Publishers.
Lawrence, D. F., Loi, N. M., & Gudex, B. W. (2019). Understanding the relationship between work intensification and burnout in secondary teachers. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 25(2), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2018.1544551
Lee, D. (2013). Students learning with mobile technologies in and out of the classroom. In A. Mendez-Vilas (Ed.), Education in a technological world: Communicating current and emerging research and technological efforts. Formatex Research Centre.
Lemar, A. (2012). Toward a theory of memory and attention. Psychological Review, 75(6), 522–536.
Lim, L. (2019). Work intensification and the secondary vice-principal role. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 190, 64–72.
Lim, L., & Pollock, K. (2019). Secondary principals’ perspectives on the impact of work intensification on the secondary vice-principal role. Leading and Managing, 25(2), 80–98.
Luu, B. (2021). SSESW research seminar series: Commissioned rapid systematic reviews. (Online presentation).
Maas, J., Schoch, S., Scholz, U., Rackow, P., Schüler, J., Wegner, M., & Keller, R. (2021). Teachers’ perceived time pressure, emotional exhaustion and the role of social support from the school principal. Social Psychology of Education, 24(2), 441–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-020-09605-8
Manila Times. (2017). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5). Retrieved from http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives, %20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf
Marois, E. (2014). Survey measures of web-oriented digital literacy. Social Science Computer Review, 23(3), 371–379.
Meyer, L. (2011). Passenger and cell phone conversations in simulated driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14(4), 392–400.
Meyer, R. (2012). The digital reproduction of inequality. In D. Grusky (Ed.), Social stratification (pp. 936–944). Westview Press.
Monk, M. (2008). Instant messaging in a context of virtual schooling: Balancing the affordances and challenges. Educational Media International, 45(1), 47–58.
Newman, M., & Gough, D. (2020). Systematic reviews in educational research: Methodology, perspectives and application. In O. Zawacki-Richter, M. Kerres, S. Bedenlier, M. Bond, & K. Buntins (Eds.), Systematic reviews in educational research (pp. 3–22). Springer VS.
Nilsson, M., Blomqvist, K., & Andersson, I. (2017). Salutogenic resources in relation to teachers’ work-life balance. Work, 56(4), 591–602. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-172528
OECD. (2018). TALIS 2018 teacher questionnaire. https://www.oecd.org/education/school/TALIS-2018-MS-Teacher-Questionnaire-ENG.pdf
OECD. (2019). TALIS 2018 technical report. https://www.oecd.org/education/school/talis-publications-and-documents.htm#Publications
OECD. (2021). Teachers getting the best out of their students: From primary to upper secondary education. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2022). OECD.Stat distribution of teachers by age and gender. https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=EAG_PERS_SHARE_AGE
Procast, S. (2014). All about me: Disclosure in online social networking profiles: The case of FACEBOOK. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 452–463.
Rubinstein, J. S., Meyer, D. E., & Evans, J. E. (2011). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(4), 763–797.
Salvucci, R. (2007). Does the central bottleneck encompass voluntary selection of hedonically based choices? Experimental Psychology, 55(5), 313–321.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Gerald Paolo L. Patrimonio (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
