Evaluating the Challenges and Opportunities in Implementing Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in Filipino Primary Schools: A Paper Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15287470Keywords:
Communicative Language Teaching, teacher beliefs, classroom practicesAbstract
In this paper, Maestre and Gindidis' study Teachers' Beliefs, Practices, and Challenges in Using Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in an ESL Context in the Philippines is critically reviewed. The study looked at the opinions, teaching strategies, and difficulties faced by English teachers in a private school in Davao City when it came to using Communicative Language Teaching (CLT). By using a qualitative approach, the researchers discovered a discrepancy between the instructors' favorable opinions of CLT and their largely conventional, teacher-centered teaching methods. Contextual impediments like big class sizes, little training focused on CLT, a lack of instructional resources, and a curriculum that prioritizes grammar-centered instruction were the main causes of this discrepancy. This analysis goes beyond the study's results and places them in a more comprehensive context. This critique evaluates the methodological robustness of the study, noting the appropriateness of its qualitative design and the value of triangulating data from multiple sources. It also considers the study’s practical relevance to the broader discourse on English language teaching in the Philippines, where English serves both as a medium of instruction and as a marker of socio-economic mobility. The review emphasizes that transforming classroom practices requires more than changing teacher beliefs—it necessitates systemic support, including curriculum reform, leadership commitment, and sustained teacher capacity-building programs. In conclusion, this critique highlights the need for educational stakeholders to foster enabling environments where communicative teaching methods can flourish. Aligning pedagogical beliefs with practice is essential to improving English language instruction and achieving communicative competence among Filipino learners in diverse ESL contexts.
References
Baker, A. M., & Loughran, M. (2019). Teacher professional development and CLT: Navigating challenges in non-Western settings. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 29(2), 99-116.
Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2016). Using mixed methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 28(1), 3-19.
Kim, M. (2017). Teacher beliefs and practices on CLT in South Korea. Asian EFL Journal, 19(4), 134-150.
Kong, P. M., & Kwan, S. P. (2021). Communicative language teaching in non-Western contexts: A critical review. Asia Pacific Education Review, 22(1), 79-90.
Liu, X. (2020). The integration of communicative language teaching in Chinese secondary schools: A case study. TESOL Quarterly, 54(3), 491-509.
Manzano, M. (2016). Teacher beliefs about communicative language teaching: A case study in the Philippines. Asian EFL Journal, 18(2), 101-115.
O'Reilly, M. (2015). Research design in qualitative research. Research Methods for Education, 3(1), 54-71.
Pham, A. (2020). CLT in Vietnam: Theoretical perspectives and classroom practice. Language Teaching Research, 24(1), 35-56.
Savignon, S. J. (2018). Communicative language teaching: Linguistic theory and pedagogical practice. TESOL Quarterly, 52(3), 457-474.
Liao, X. (2019). Challenges of implementing communicative language teaching in China: A case study. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(4), 789-797.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Angelie Caparida, Jodessa M. Capuno, Joy D. Mendoza, Eduardo F. Omaña (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.