Influence of Social Media Platforms on Young Voters in the Barangay Elections
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15411298Keywords:
Barangay elections, social media platforms, young votersAbstract
This study investigates the influence of social media platforms on young voters during barangay elections, focusing on Facebook, YouTube, and TikTok and analyzing responses based on age, sex, highest educational attainment, and average family monthly income. Among the 278 respondents, the majority were female, over 23 years old, college graduates, and from families earning below ₱15,000 monthly. Findings reveal that Facebook is the most influential platform, primarily used for viewing political content, reading commentaries, and informing voting decisions—supporting Pariser's (2011) concept of algorithm-driven selective exposure. YouTube followed with moderate influence, offering in-depth political content such as documentaries and interviews, aligning with Gil de Zúñiga et al. (2014). TikTok showed the least influence, consistent with Zulli & Zulli's (2022) assertion of its entertainment-oriented nature. Statistical analysis using the Mann-Whitney U test indicated that age and educational attainment significantly influenced perceptions of Facebook and YouTube, while only education showed a significant effect on TikTok. Sex and income were not statistically significant factors. Overall, Facebook emerged as the most impactful platform in shaping political behavior among older and more educated youth, with YouTube providing supplementary depth and TikTok having limited political relevance. The study highlights the critical role of digital literacy and education in fostering informed political participation and calls on educators, policymakers, and youth to utilize digital platforms for civic engagement and democratic development.
References
Arugay, A. A. (2022). Stronger social media influence in the 2022 Philippine elections (ISEAS Perspective No. 2022/33). ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute. https://www.iseas.edu.sg/articles-commentaries/iseas-perspective/2022-33-stronger-social-media-influence-in-the-2022-philippine-elections-by-aries-a-arugay/
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3(3), 265–299. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03
Besley, T., & Case, A. (2003). Political institutions and policy choices: Evidence from the United States. Journal of Economic Literature, 41(1), 7–73. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.41.1.7
Boulianne, S. (2015). Social media use and participation: A meta-analysis of current research. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 524–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008542
Caparas, M. (2024, 2025). [Surveys on social media usage in the Philippines].
Chadwick, A., & Stromer-Galley, J. (2016). Digital media, power, and democracy in parties and election campaigns: Party decline or party renewal? International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(3), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216646731
Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015
Commission on Elections. (2023). Barangay election guidelines.
Dexter, E. (2023). The role of social media in Barack Obama’s campaign.
Garcia, A. (2024). COMELEC Resolution No. 11064 on Digital Election Campaigning.
Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2014). Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 552–566. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12084
Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2007). The role of education quality for economic growth. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-4122
Howe, R. (2024). Meltwater survey on digital usage in the Philippines.
Inquirer.net. (2021). Filipinos’ global internet usage ranking.
International IDEA. (2017). Voter education. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. Retrieved from https://www.idea.int/data-tools/tools/voter-education
Kharpuri, F. L., & Bhaskar, R. (2024). A study exploring relationship between risk factors and resilience among youth. Indian Journal of Psychiatric Nursing, 21(1), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.4103/iopn.iopn_85_23
Lessig, L. (2004). Free culture: How big media uses technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity. Choice Reviews Online, 42(03), 42–1641. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.42-1641
Mayernik, M. S. (2011). Metadata realities for cyberinfrastructure: Data authors as metadata creators. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2042653
McCombes, S. (2023). Descriptive research design [Revised edition].
Nations, D. (2024). Definition and usage of Facebook.
Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin Press.
Porio, E., & Sarmiento, J. P. (2019). Barangay governance and resilience.
Rana, N. P., Slade, E. L., Sahu, G. P., et al. (2019). Digital and social media marketing: Emerging applications and theoretical development. Springer Nature.
Schmitter, P. C., & Karl, T. L. (1991). What democracy is… and is not. Journal of Democracy, 2(3), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1991.0033
Smith, A., & Anderson, M. (2018). Social media use in 2018. Pew Research Center.
Sloam, J. (2014). Youth political participation in the digital age.
Sloam, J. (2014). New voice, less equal: The civic and political engagement of young people in the United States and Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 47(5), 663–688. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012453441
SPIRALYTICS. (2023). Social media usage and time spent by Filipinos.
Sternquist, J. (2020). YouTube and political learning: A passive medium for active minds? Journal of Social Media Studies, 4(2), 145–162.
Valencia, M. S. F. P. (2023). Partisanship and performance of youth leaders in the Philippines. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science – Social Sciences, 13(1), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.46223/hcmcoujs.soci.en.13.1.2490.2023
Velasquez, A., & Rojas, H. (2017). Political expression on social media: The role of communication competence and expected outcomes. Social Media + Society, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117696521
Vergeer, M., Hermans, L., & Sams, S. (2011). Online social networks and micro-blogging in political campaigning: The exploration of a new campaign tool and a new campaign style. Party Politics, 19(3), 477–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811407580
Verhoef, P. C., et al. (2019). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022
Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Council of Europe report DGI(2017)09. Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/information-disorder-report-version-august-2018/16808c9c77
Zulli, D., & Zulli, D. J. (2022). Extending the “platform vernacular” approach: TikTok, identity, and algorithmic awareness. New Media & Society, 24(4), 880–898. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820951329
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Anthony Denmark O. Cajurao, Yasmin Pascual-Dormido (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
