Investigating Factors Impacting Literacy Skills in Philippine Elementary Schools
Keywords:
Reading literacy, Elementary schools, Philippines, Access to resourcesAbstract
This study investigates the factors influencing low reading literacy skills in Philippine elementary schools through thematic analysis of existing literature. Key findings reveal challenges in accessing age-appropriate reading materials and resources, limited teacher training, and instructional practices, socio-economic disparities, and emerging opportunities and challenges in digital literacy education. The scarcity of resources in many schools, particularly in low-income areas, hinders students' literacy development. Addressing this requires equitable access to quality materials and professional development for educators. Additionally, socio-economic status and parental involvement significantly impact students' reading outcomes, underscoring the importance of promoting family literacy programs and community partnerships. Furthermore, integrating digital literacy presents opportunities to enhance reading skills but requires addressing challenges such as digital distraction and information overload. Overall, addressing these multifaceted factors necessitates a collaborative approach involving policymakers, educators, families, and communities to foster a culture of literacy and empower students with the skills needed for academic success and digital citizenship.
References
Abella, J., Kilag, O. K., Andrin, G., Tañiza, F. N., Groenewald, E., & Cordova Jr, N. (2024). Benchmarking Literacy and Numeracy: The Contributing Elements. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 2(1), 90-99.
Andrin, G., Kilag, O. K., Abella, J., Tañiza, F. N., Groenewald, E., & Cordova Jr, N. (2024). Leadership in Literacy: The Role of Instructional Leadership in Fostering Student Reading Achievement. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 2(1), 100-109.
Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (2007). Increasing young low-income children’s oral vocabulary repertoires through rich and focused instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 107(3), 251-271.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Chall, J. S., & Jacobs, V. A. (2003). Poor children's fourth-grade slump. American educator, 27(1), 14-17.
Cordova Jr, N., Kilag, O. K., Andrin, G., Groenewald, E., & Abella, J. (2024). Promoting Literacy in Early Childhood: Leadership Practices and Long-Term Educational Impact. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 2(1), 79-89.
De Gracia, A. M., Canubas, A. L., Suba-an, J., Alfar, J., Kilag, O. K., & Abendan, C. F. (2023). Understanding Early Literacy Development in Emerging Readers: Insights from Dorothy Strickland. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 1(5), 171-182.
Desimone, L. M., & Garet, M. S. (2015). Best practices in teacher's professional development in the United States.
Desmond, C., Watt, K., Saha, A., Huang, J., & Lu, C. (2020). Prevalence and number of children living in institutional care: global, regional, and country estimates. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 4(5), 370-377.
Desimone, L., Payne, B., Fedoravicius, N., Henrich, C. C., & Finn-Stevenson, M. (2004). Comprehensive school reform: An implementation study of preschool programs in elementary schools. The Elementary School Journal, 104(5), 369-389.
Guskey, T. R. (2003). How classroom assessments improve learning. On Formative Assessment: Readings from Educational Leadership (EL Essentials).
Hobbes R. (2010). Digital and media literacy: A plan of action. New York: The Aspen Institute.
Kim, J. S., Burkhauser, M. A., Relyea, J. E., Gilbert, J. B., Scherer, E., Fitzgerald, J., ... & McIntyre, J. (2023). A longitudinal randomized trial of a sustained content literacy intervention from first to second grade: Transfer effects on students’ reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(1), 73.
Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., Castek, J., & Henry, L. A. (2018). New literacies: A dual-level theory of the changing nature of literacy, instruction, and assessment. In Theoretical models and processes of literacy (pp. 319-346). Routledge.
Leu, D. J., Forzani, E., Rhoads, C., Maykel, C., Kennedy, C., & Timbrell, N. (2015). The new literacies of online research and comprehension: Rethinking the reading achievement gap. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(1), 37-59.
Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2008). Parental mediation of children's internet use. Journal of broadcasting & electronic media, 52(4), 581-599.
Mansueto, D., Kilag, O. K., Andrin, G., Guiñeta, R., Ford, L. J., & Tiu, J. (2024). Leadership Impact on Literacy: Principals, Synergistic Partnerships, and Progressive Pathways for School Improvement. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE), 1(2), 50-56.
McKeown, M. G., Beck, I. L., & Blake, R. G. (2009). Rethinking reading comprehension instruction: A comparison of instruction for strategies and content approaches. Reading research quarterly, 44(3), 218-253.
Mraz, M., & Rasinski, T. V. (2007). Summer reading loss. The Reading Teacher, 60(8), 784-789.
National Reading Panel (US), National Institute of Child Health, & Human Development (US). (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.
OECD, P. (2019). Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do, PISA.
Rideout, V., & Katz, V. S. (2016). Opportunity for all? Technology and learning in lower-income families. In Joan Ganz Cooney center at sesame workshop. Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop. 1900 Broadway, New York, NY 10023.
Sabia, J. J., & Bass, B. (2017). Do anti-bullying laws work? New evidence on school safety and youth violence. Journal of population economics, 30, 473-502.
Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., Berkeley, S., & Graetz, J. E. (2010). Do special education interventions improve learning of secondary content? A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 31(6), 437-449.
Sénéchal, M., & LeFevre, J. A. (2002). Parental involvement in the development of children’s reading skill: A five‐year longitudinal study. Child development, 73(2), 445-460.
Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of educational research, 75(3), 417-453.
Sirin, S. R. (2005). The relationship between socioeconomic status and school outcomes [microform]: Meta analytic review of research. Rev Educ Res, 75(3), 417-53.
Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Rand Corporation.
Suggate, S. P. (2016). A meta-analysis of the long-term effects of phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, and reading comprehension interventions. Journal of learning disabilities, 49(1), 77-96.
UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS). (2018). Education and disability: analysis of data from 49 countries. Information Paper No. 49.
UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2018). UIS Education Data Release: September 2018. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. https://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/ip55-uis-education-data-release-september-2018_1.pdf
Vestal, P., Kilag, O. K., Alvez, G. G., Escabas, D., Ignacio, R., & Abendan, C. F. (2023). Bridging the Literacy Gap: A Multisensory Approach to Effective Intervention. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 1(4), 156-168.
