Context Matters: The Influence of Organizational Dynamics on the Utilization of Academic Management Research
Keywords:
management research, organizational decision-making, utilization, translation, contextual factorsAbstract
This integrative literature review examines the challenges surrounding the utilization of academic management research in organizational decision-making processes. Four key findings emerge: limited utilization of academic research, challenges in translating research into practice, the role of contextual factors, and the impact of academic paradigms. Despite the abundance of scholarly works, practitioners often prioritize other sources of information over academic studies. The complexity of real-world managerial challenges presents obstacles to translating theoretical insights into actionable strategies within organizational contexts. Contextual factors, including organizational culture and societal norms, influence the relevance and applicability of management research. Academic paradigms may prioritize theoretical rigor over practical relevance, leading to a disconnect between academic research and managerial decision-making processes. Addressing this gap requires collaboration and openness between scholars and practitioners to reconcile differences and enhance the relevance and impact of management research in organizational settings.
References
Andrin, G., Kilag, O. K., Groenewald, E., Unabia, R., Cordova Jr, N., & Nacario, K. M. (2023). Beyond Management: Cultivating Leadership in Educational Institutions. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 1(6), 365-375.
Aquino, S. R., Kilag, O. K., & Valle, J. (2023). From Preparedness to Action: Effective Real-time Crisis Management. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 1(5), 372-384.
Aram, J. D., & Salipante Jr, P. F. (2003). Bridging scholarship in management: Epistemological reflections. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 189-205.
Beyer, J. M., & Trice, H. M. (1982). The utilization process: A conceptual framework and synthesis of empirical findings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 591-622.
Bolton, M. J., & Stolcis, G. B. (2003). Ties that do not bind: Musings on the specious relevance of academic research. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 626-630.
Brannick, T., & Coghlan, D. (2006). Reflexivity in management and business research: what do we mean?. Irish Journal of Management, 27(2).
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 14(4), 532-550.
Dagala, F., Kilag, O. K., Unabia, R., & Arcillo, M. (2023). The Crucial Role of Educational Leaders in Optimizing School Efficiency. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 1(6), 263-273.
Diano Jr, F., Kilag, O. K., Malbas, M., Catacutan, A., Tiongzon, B., & Abendan, C. F. (2023). Towards Global Competence: Innovations in the Philippine Curriculum for Addressing International Challenges. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 1(4), 295-307.
Ford, E. W., Duncan, W. J., Bedeian, A. G., Ginter, P. M., Rousculp, M. D., & Adams, A. M. (2005). Mitigating risks, visible hands, inevitable disasters, and soft variables: Management research that matters to managers. Academy of Management Perspectives, 19(4), 24-38.
Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management learning & education, 4(1), 75-91.
Gurley, D. K., Peters, G. B., Collins, L., & Fifolt, M. (2015). Mission, vision, values, and goals: An exploration of key organizational statements and daily practice in schools. Journal of Educational Change, 16, 217-242.
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational technology research and development, 48(4), 63-85.
Kelemen, M., & Bansal, P. (2002). The conventions of management research and their relevance to management practice. British Journal of Management, 13(2), 97-108.
Martinez, N., Kilag, O. K., & Macario, R. (2023). The Impact of Organizational Culture on Leadership Strategies in Crisis Management. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 1(5), 454-466.
Mintzberg, H. (2004). Managers not MBSs. Management Today, 20(7), 10-13.
Langley, A., & Tsoukas, H. (2010). Introducing perspectives on process organization studies. Process, sensemaking, and organizing, 1(9), 1-27.
Lin, Y., Cole, C., & Dalkir, K. (2014). The relationship between perceived value and information source use during KM strategic decision-making: A study of 17 Chinese business managers. Information Processing & Management, 50(1), 156-174.
Noble, J. I., Kilag, O. K., & Viscara, C. (2023). Bridging Academia and Community: A Holistic Approach to Disaster Risk Management. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 1(6), 36-45.
Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2006). Hard facts, dangerous half-truths, and total nonsense: Profiting from evidence-based management. Harvard Business Press.
Rangachari, P. (2018). Innovation implementation in the context of hospital QI: lessons learned and strategies for success. Innovation and entrepreneurship in health, 1-14.
Starkey, K., & Madan, P. (2001). Bridging the relevance gap: Aligning stakeholders in the future of management research. British Journal of management, 12, S3-S26.
Tranfield, D., & Starkey, K. (1998). The nature, social organization and promotion of management research: Towards policy. British journal of Management, 9(4), 341-353.
Uy, F., Kilag, O. K., Abendan, C. F., Macapobre, K., Cañizares, M. C., & Yray, F. (2023). Application of Adaptive Crisis Management Theory: The Dynamics of Leadership in Times of Crisis. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 1(5), 159-170.
Uy, F., Kilag, O. K., Calledo, M. F., Cerna, Y. D., Angtud, N. A., & Villanueva, K. (2024). Quality Performance of Teachers: Work Environment, Work Attitude, and Principal Supervision: Qualitative Investigation. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE), 1(1), 101-109.
Vermeulen, F. (2005). On rigor and relevance: Fostering dialectic progress in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 978-982.
Whetten, D. A. (2009). An examination of the interface between context and theory applied to the study of Chinese organizations. Management and organization review, 5(1), 29-56.
Wensley, R. (2007). Beyond rigour and relevance: The underlying nature of both business schools and management research. Advanced Institute of Management Research Paper, (051).
