The Impact and Challenges of School-Based Decision-Making on Educational Outcomes
Keywords:
school-based decision-making, SBDM, educational outcomes, student achievement, equity, decentralizationAbstract
This systematic review examines the effectiveness of school-based decision-making (SBDM) in improving educational outcomes. Drawing upon a synthesis of empirical research and theoretical frameworks, the review explores the impact of SBDM initiatives on student achievement, equity considerations, and implementation challenges. Findings suggest that SBDM holds promise for enhancing educational outcomes by empowering educators to make informed decisions tailored to the specific needs of their students. However, challenges such as bureaucratic inertia, resistance to change, and limited stakeholder capacity pose significant barriers to effective SBDM implementation. Moreover, equity considerations highlight the importance of addressing disparities in resource allocation and ensuring transparency and accountability in decision-making processes. Moving forward, efforts to build capacity among stakeholders, foster collaboration, and create supportive policy environments will be essential for maximizing the potential of SBDM to drive sustained improvements in educational outcomes. This review provides valuable insights for policymakers, educators, and stakeholders seeking to promote decentralized decision-making and advance educational equity and excellence.
References
Abella, J., Kilag, O. K., Andrin, G., Tañiza, F. N., Groenewald, E., & Cordova Jr, N. (2024). Literacy Leadership in Elementary Schools: The Connections between Principal Practices and Reading Performance. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 2(1), 69-78.
Andrin, G., Kilag, O. K., Groenewald, E., Benitez, J., Dagala, F., & Ubay, R. (2024). Borderless Learning Environments: Impacts on Educational Management Strategies. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE), 1(2), 43-49.
Braun, H., Jenkins, F., & Grigg, W. (2006). Comparing Private Schools and Public Schools Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling. NCES 2006-461. National Center for Education Statistics.
Bryk, A. S. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(7), 23-30.
Cordova Jr, N., Kilag, O. K., Andrin, G., Tañiza, F. N., Groenewald, E., & Abella, J. (2024). Leadership Strategies for Numeracy Development in Educational Settings. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 2(1), 58-68.
Dagala, F., Kilag, O. K., Unabia, R., & Arcillo, M. (2023). The Crucial Role of Educational Leaders in Optimizing School Efficiency. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 1(6), 263-273.
Giles, C., & Hargreaves, A. (2006). The sustainability of innovative schools as learning organizations and professional learning communities during standardized reform. Educational administration quarterly, 42(1), 124-156.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1998). Exploring the principal's contribution to school effectiveness: 1980‐1995. School effectiveness and school improvement, 9(2), 157-191.
Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: Effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School effectiveness and school improvement, 17(2), 201-227.
Marks, H. M., & Printy, S. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational administration quarterly, 39(3), 370-397.
Martinez, N., Kilag, O. K., & Macario, R. (2023). The Impact of Organizational Culture on Leadership Strategies in Crisis Management. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 1(5), 454-466.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1996). Leadership for the schoolhouse: How is it different? Why is it important?. Jossey-Bass, Inc. Publishers, 350 Sansome Street, San Francisco, CA 94104..
Smylie, M. A. (1992). Teacher participation in school decision making: Assessing willingness to participate. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(1), 53-67.
Uy, F. T., Sasan, J. M., & Kilag, O. K. (2023). School Principal Administrative-Supervisory Leadership During the Pandemic: A Phenomenological Qualitative Study. International Journal of Theory and Application in Elementary and Secondary School Education, 5(1), 44-62.
Weitzel, P. C., & Lubienski, C. A. (2010). Grading charter schools. The charter school experiment: Expectations, evidence, and implications, 15-32.
