An Evaluation of the Research Training Seminar Workshop Using Four Stages Evaluation Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14957472Keywords:
Research Training Seminar Workshop, Evaluation , Four Stages Evaluation Model, Higher EducationAbstract
Research training is very important for students to develop competencies in undertaking systematic investigations. Research training programs must be designed and continuously evaluated for effectiveness. This study assesses into the effectiveness of a Research Training Seminar Workshop in terms of the Four Stages Evaluation Model, which discusses planning, implementation, output, and impact. The study sought to assess reaction and learning levels before and after the seminar, behavior change, and overall assessment of the workshop. The study used a descriptive evaluation research design and a quantitative approach. The targeted population included 347 tertiary students at a university in Central Mindanao, Philippines, who were in thesis writing during the Second Semester of Academic Year 2024-2025. A researcher-made survey questionnaire, in addition to the researcher-made pre-test and post-test were utilized. Data analysis was achieved using mean, standard deviation, and paired sample t-test to measure participants' reactions, learning improvements, and behavioral changes. Participants strongly agreed that the seminar was well-structured, met their expectations, and was relevant. A statistically significant increase in post-test scores indicated that the level of research competencies improved. Behavioral improvements have been observed, specifically on the application of research strategies learned. The recommendations for enhancing future research trainings in research seminars include adding interactive methods of learning, extending the time for training, and adding follow-up mentorship programs. Such refinements will greatly strengthen the research skills of the participants, make them more effective in engaging, and will create a sustainability culture of research in the academic institutions.
References
Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41(1), 63–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00632.x
Baybayan, J., (2025). Assessing the Role of Formative Assessment in Achieving Math Learning Goals: A Goal-Based Evaluation. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 32(1), 12-18. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14848799
Brew, A., & Boud, D. (1995). Teaching and research: Establishing the vital link with learning. Higher Education, 29(3), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384493
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915
Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Corwin Press.
Guskey, T. R. (2018). Evaluating professional development. Corwin Press.
Johnson, D., & Brown, M. (2019). The impact of structured research training on academic productivity. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 45(3), 215-230.
Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2016). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (3rd ed.). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2016). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (3rd ed.). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2015). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (8th ed.). Routledge.
Lee, S., & Park, J. (2021). Enhancing research competencies through seminar-based training: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Educational Studies, 28(2), 112-129.
Phillips, J. J., & Phillips, P. P. (2017). Handbook of training evaluation and measurement methods (4th ed.). Routledge.
Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2012). The science of training and development in organizations: What matters in practice. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(2), 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612436661
Smith, R., Jones, P., & Taylor, K. (2020). A four-stage evaluation model for professional development programs. Educational Assessment Review, 32(4), 289-305.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jericho Baybayan (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.