Enhancing Student Engagement and Critical Thinking through Interdisciplinary Education in Senior High Schools

Osias Kit  Kilag

Authors

Osias Kit T. Kilag Vice-President for Academic Affairs, PAU Excellencia Global Academy Foundation, Inc. Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0845-3373 (unauthenticated)

Keywords:

Interdisciplinarity, Curriculum integration, Secondary education, Teaching strategies, Interdisciplinary education

Abstract

This paper investigates the employment of interdisciplinary research in senior high schools, focusing on its definition, implementation, benefits, and challenges. Interdisciplinary approaches integrate knowledge across subjects, fostering critical thinking and problem-solving. Utilizing a systematic review of recent literature, this study analyzes interdisciplinary practices, evaluates their effects on students and teachers, and identifies key conditions for successful implementation. Findings indicate that while interdisciplinary approaches enrich learning experiences, challenges such as teacher collaboration, curriculum alignment, and assessment methods hinder their broader adoption. Recommendations for policy and practice are proposed to enhance interdisciplinary education in senior high schools.

References

Baillat, G., & Niclot, D. (2010). In search of interdisciplinarity in schools in France: From curriculum to practice. Issues in Integrative Studies, 28(28), 170–177.

Baluteau, F. (2004). Les dispositifs interdisciplinaires dans les collèges: Les enjeux de l’engagement. Spirale-Revue de recherches en éducation, 34, 171–186. https://doi.org/10.3406/spira.2004.1359

Bartlett, J. (2005). Curriculum integration in the junior secondary school. Curriculum Matters, 1, 172–186. Retrieved from Web of Science.

Beane, J. A. (1997). Curriculum integration: Designing the core of democratic education. Teachers College Press.

Boix-Mansilla, V., & Duraising, E. D. (2007). Targeted assessment of students’ interdisciplinary work: An empirically grounded framework proposed. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(2), 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2007.0008

Bollati, I. M., Gatti, C., Pelfini, M. P., Speciale, L., Maffeo, L., & Pelfini, M. (2017). Climbing walls in Earth Sciences education: An interdisciplinary approach for the secondary school (1st level). Rendiconti Online Societa Geologica Italiana, 44, 134–142. https://doi.org/10.3301/rol.2018.19

Braskén, M., Hemmi, K., & Kurtén, B. (2020). Implementing a multidisciplinary curriculum in a Finnish lower secondary school – The perspective of science and mathematics. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(6), 852–868. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1623311

Choi, B. C., & Pak, A. W. (2006). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education, and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. Clinical and Investigative Medicine, 29(6), 351.

Cuervo, L. (2018). Study of an interdisciplinary didactic model in a secondary education music class. Music Education Research, 20(4), 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2018.1433148

Darbellay, F. (2019). L’interdisciplinarité à l’école: succès, résistance, diversité. Alphil.

D’Hainaut, L. (1986). L’interdisciplinarité dans l’enseignement général. Paris: Division des sciences de l’éducation, des contenus et des méthodes. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/education/pdf/31_14_f.pdf

Eishof, L. (2003). Technological education, interdisciplinarity, and the journey toward sustainable development: Nurturing new communities of practice. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 3(2), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150309556558

Fenwick, A. J. J., Minty, S., & Priestley, M. (2013). Swimming against the tide: A case study of an integrated social studies department. The Curriculum Journal, 24(3), 454–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2013.805658

Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107

Fidalgo Neto, A. A., Lopes, R. M., Magalhães, J. L. C., Pierini, M. F., & Alves, L. A. (2014). Interdisciplinarity and teacher education: The teacher’s training of the secondary school in Rio de Janeiro—Brazil. Creative Education, 5(4), 262–272. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2014.54035

Gajic, O., & Zukovic, S. (2013). Integrativity and interdisciplinarity in religious and literary education. European Journal of Science and Theology, 9(4), 61–76. Retrieved from Web of Science.

Gill, C. (2013). How can the secondary school learning model be adapted to provide for more meaningful curriculum integration? University of Waikato.

Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., & Blanchard, C. (2000). On the assessment of situational intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS). Motivation and Emotion, 24(3), 175–213. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005614228250

Hardré, P. L., Ling, C., Shehab, R. L., Nanny, M. A., Nollert, M. U., Refai, H., & Wollega, E. D. (2013). Teachers in an interdisciplinary learning community: Engaging, integrating, and strengthening K-12 education. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487113496640

Harris, A., & de Bruin, L. (2018). An international study of creative pedagogies in practice in secondary schools: Toward a creative ecology. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 15(2), 215–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/15505170.2018.1457999

Hasni, A., Lenoir, Y., & Alessandra, F. (2015). Mandated interdisciplinarity in secondary school: The case of science, technology, and mathematics teachers in Quebec. Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies, 33(33), 144–180.

Hawkey, K., James, J., & Tidmarsh, C. (2019). Using wicked problems to foster interdisciplinary practice among UK trainee teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 45(4), 446–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2019.1639263

Holmbukt, T. E., & Larsen, A. B. (2016). Interdisciplinary teaching as motivation: An initiative for change in post-16 vocational education. Nordic Journal of Modern Language Methodology, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.46364/njmlm.v4i1.325

Klein, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Wayne State University Press.

Klein, J. T. (2010). A taxonomy of interdisciplinarity. The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, 15(6), 15–30.

Kneen, J., Breeze, T., Davies-Barnes, S., John, V., & Thayer, E. (2020). Curriculum integration: The challenges for primary and secondary schools in developing a new curriculum in the expressive arts. The Curriculum Journal, 31(2), 258–275. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.34

Lattuca, L. R., Voight, L. J., & Fath, K. Q. (2004). Does interdisciplinarity promote learning? Theoretical support and researchable questions. The Review of Higher Education, 28(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2004.0028

Lenoir, Y., & Hasni, A. (2016). Interdisciplinarity in primary and secondary school: Issues and perspectives. Creative Education, 7(16), 2433–2458. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2016.716233

Lenoir, Y., Hasni, A., & Klein, J. T. (2010). Interdisciplinarity in Quebec schools: 40 years of problematic implementation. Issues in Integrative Studies, 28(28), 238–294.

Lenoir, Y., & Sauvé, L. (1998). Note de synthèse. De l’interdisciplinarité scolaire à l’interdisciplinarité dans la formation à l’enseignement: Un état de la question [2-Interdisciplinarité scolaire et formation interdisciplinaire à l’enseignement]. Revue Française de Pédagogie, 121, 27–35. https://doi.org/10.3406/rfp.1998.1736

Enhancing Student Engagement and Critical Thinking through Interdisciplinary Education in Senior High Schools

Authors

Keywords:

Abstract

References

Downloads

Published

Issue

Section

License

How to Cite