Educational Transformation: The MATATAG Curriculum and Philippine Education Reform
Keywords:
MATATAG Curriculum, Philippine education reform, 21st-century competencies, curriculum implementation challenges, foundational skillsAbstract
The MATATAG Curriculum, a pivotal initiative in Philippine education reform, embodies a comprehensive approach to addressing contemporary educational challenges. Through alignment with national education goals, it prioritizes competencies vital for 21st-century citizenship, including critical thinking and cultural appreciation. Despite its strengths, challenges persist in implementation, particularly concerning curriculum congestion and teacher readiness. Nonetheless, the curriculum's renewed focus on foundational skills, notably literacy and numeracy, signifies a proactive response to the shortcomings identified in national and international assessments. Furthermore, its integration of Mother Tongue-Based Multilingual Education (MTB-MLE) principles underscores a commitment to linguistic diversity and inclusive pedagogy. By leveraging students' first languages, the curriculum creates a more supportive learning environment conducive to deeper engagement and comprehension. Overall, the MATATAG Curriculum represents a holistic and forward-thinking approach to educational reform, laying the groundwork for a more equitable, inclusive, and responsive education system in the Philippines. Continued efforts to address implementation challenges and support teacher development will be crucial for realizing its transformative potential and ensuring the holistic development of Filipino learners.
References
Adams, M. J. (1994). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print.
Baker, C. (2011). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism. Multilingual matters.
Bennett, M. J. (2009). Defining, measuring, and facilitating intercultural learning: a conceptual introduction to the Intercultural Education double supplement. Intercultural education, 20(sup1), S1-S13.
Benson, C. (2019). L1-based multilingual education in the Asia and Pacific region and beyond: Where are we, and where do we need to go?. In The Routledge international handbook of language education policy in Asia (pp. 29-41). Routledge.
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I., Green, D. W., & Gollan, T. H. (2009). Bilingual minds. Psychological science in the public interest, 10(3), 89-129.
Cummins, J. (2008). Teaching for transfer: Challenging the two solitudes assumption in bilingual education. Encyclopedia of language and education, 5, 65-75.
DepEd Order No. 55. (2016). Policy Guidelines on the National Assessment of Student Learning for the K to 12 Basic Education Program. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/DO_s2016_55-3.pdf
DepEd. (2019). The Policy Guidelines on the K-12 Basic Education Program. Department of Education, Republic of the Philippines. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/DO_s2019_021.pdf
Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., ... & Japel, C. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental psychology, 43(6), 1428.
Education for All Global Monitoring Report. (2015). Philippines Country Report. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000230331
Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight assessment, 1(1), 1-23.
Gándara, P., Losen, D., August, D., Uriarte, M., Gómez, M. C., & Hopkins, M. (2010). Forbidden language: A brief history of US language policy. Forbidden language: English learners and restrictive language policies, 20-33.
García, O., & Wei, L. (2015). Translanguaging, bilingualism, and bilingual education. The handbook of bilingual and multilingual education, 223-240.
Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. routledge.
Heckman, J. J. (2006). Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children. Science, 312(5782), 1900-1902.
Heugh, K. (2018). Conclusion: Multilingualism, Diversity and Equitable Learning: Towards Crossing the ‘Abyss’. The multilingual edge of education, 341-367.
Jorgenson, D. W., & Vu, K. M. (2016). The ICT revolution, world economic growth, and policy issues. Telecommunications Policy, 40(5), 383-397.
Kilag, O. K., Jesus, J., Uy, F., Sasan, J. M., Seblos, K., & Gier, R. A. (2024). Educational Transformation: Perspectives on the Implementation of the Matatag Curriculum in the Philippines. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE), 1(5), 306-311.
Kilag, O. K., Andrin, G., Abellanosa, C., Villaver Jr, M., Uy, F., & Sasan, J. M. (2024). MATATAG Curriculum Rollout: Understanding Challenges for Effective Implementation. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE), 1(5), 172-177.
Levin, B., & Fullan, M. (2008). Learning about system renewal. Educational management administration & leadership, 36(2), 289-303.
Mihailidis, P., & Thevenin, B. (2013). Media literacy as a core competency for engaged citizenship in participatory democracy. American behavioral scientist, 57(11), 1611-1622.
Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Kelly, D. L., & Fishbein, B. (2020). TIMSS 2019 international results in mathematics and science.
National Early Literacy Panel. (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. National Institute for Literacy. https://lincs.ed.gov/publications/pdf/NELPReport09.pdf
National Research Council, & Mathematics Learning Study Committee. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academies Press.
OECD. (2020). Equity in Education: Breaking Down Barriers to Social Mobility. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/equity-in-education-9789264073234-en.htm
Pinar, W. F. (2019). What is curriculum theory?. Routledge.
PISA. (2015). Students' Well-Being: PISA 2015 Results (Volume III). OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/pisa-2015-results-volume-iii-9789264273856-en.htm
Popham, W. J. (2001). Teaching to the Test?. Educational leadership, 58(6), 16-21.
SEA-PLM Secretariat. (2020). Southeast Asia Primary Learning Metrics (SEA-PLM) 2019 Regional Report. UNESCO Bangkok. https://www.seaplm.org/PUBLICATIONS/regional%20results/SEA-PLM%202019%20Main%20Regional%20Report.pdf
Shanahan, T. (2020). The Science of Reading. The Reading Teacher, 74(2), 119-125.
Schleicher, A. (2018). Naikrashchyi klas u sviti: yak stvoryty osvitniu systemu 21-ho stolittia [World Class: How to Build a 21st-Century School System]. Lviv: Litopys [in Ukrainian].
Schleicher, A. (2018). Making education reform happen. World Class: how to build a 21st-century school system.
Schiro, M. (2013). Curriculum theory: Conflicting visions and enduring concerns. Sage.
Schmidt, W., Houang, R., & Cogan, L. (2002). A coherent curriculum. American Education, 26(10), 1-18.
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (2013). Linguistic genocide in education--or worldwide diversity and human rights?. Routledge.
Stiggins, R. J., Arter, J. A., & Chappuis, J. (2004). Classroom assessment for student learning: Doing it right, using it well. Assessment Training Institute.
Tan, E. A. (2018). Quality, inequality and recent education reform. Philippine Review of Economics (Online ISSN 2984-8156), 54(2), 110-137.
UNESCO. (2016). If you don’t understand, how can you learn?. Policy Paper 24.
UNESCO. (2016). Education for people and planet: Creating sustainable futures for all. UNESCO Publishing. https://www.unesco.org/gem-report/en/education-people-and-planet
UNESCO. (2003). Education in a multilingual world. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000129728
UNICEF. (2019). The Southeast Asia primary learning metrics program: Thinking globally in a regional context.
United Nations. (2019). Sustainable Development Goals Report 2019. United Nations Publications. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2019/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2019.pdf
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives.
